Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 163
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 163.52 (2026)

Validity of property acquisition

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
September 6, 2002
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 426 - 124th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

(A) The failure of an acquiring agency to satisfy a requirement of section 163.59 of the Revised Code does not affect the validity of any property acquisition by purchase or condemnation.

(B) Nothing in sections 163.51 to 163.62 of the Revised Code shall be construed as creating, in any condemnation proceeding brought under the power of eminent domain, any element of value or damage not in existence immediately prior to June 11, 1971.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1983–2024 · leading case: State ex rel. Ohio History Connection v. Moundbuilders Country Club Co., 2022 Ohio 4345 (Ohio 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State ex rel. Ohio History Connection v. Moundbuilders Country Club Co., 2022 Ohio 4345 (Ohio 2022). · cites it 2× “R.C. 163.52(A) (“The failure of an acquiring agency to satisfy a requirement of section 163.”
City of Wadsworth v. Yannerilla, 866 N.E.2d 1113 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 3× “” R.C. 163.52(A). Relying on R.C. 163.52(A), the Weir court held that a violation of R.”
State ex rel. Ohio History Connection v. Moundbuilders Country Club Co., 2020 Ohio 276 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “In any event, however, we note R.C. 163.52(A) states: “The failure of an acquiring agency to satisfy a requirement of section 163.”
Weir v. Kebe, 503 N.E.2d 177 (Ohio Ct. App. 1985). “59(C), then, is the amount fixed by the pertinent state official and not the amount submitted by any particular state appraiser. Moreover, even if the state had violated R.”
Weir v. Consol. Rail Corp., 465 N.E.2d 1341 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983). “” (R.C. 163.52.) These provisions were not intended to render the statutes nugatory, however.”
Lawnfield Props., LLC v. City of Mentor, 2018 Ohio 2447 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 5× “The Ninth District noted that R.C. 163.52(A) provides: "The failure of an acquiring agency to satisfy a requirement of section 163.”
Algoma Grp., A Gen. P'ship v. Marchbanks, 2024 Ohio 2342 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “) Ohio History Connection, 2022-Ohio-4345, ¶ 35 , citing R.C. 163.52(A) (“The failure of an acquiring agency to satisfy a requirement of section 163.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 163.52(A) — 6 cases
State ex rel. Ohio History Connection v. Moundbuilders Country Club Co., 2022 Ohio 4345 (Ohio 2022). “R.C. 163.52(A) (“The failure of an acquiring agency to satisfy a requirement of section 163.”
City of Wadsworth v. Yannerilla, 866 N.E.2d 1113 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). “” R.C. 163.52(A). Relying on R.C. 163.52(A), the Weir court held that a violation of R.”
State ex rel. Ohio History Connection v. Moundbuilders Country Club Co., 2020 Ohio 276 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). “In any event, however, we note R.C. 163.52(A) states: “The failure of an acquiring agency to satisfy a requirement of section 163.”
Weir v. Kebe, 503 N.E.2d 177 (Ohio Ct. App. 1985). “59(C), then, is the amount fixed by the pertinent state official and not the amount submitted by any particular state appraiser. Moreover, even if the state had violated R.”
Lawnfield Props., LLC v. City of Mentor, 2018 Ohio 2447 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “The Ninth District noted that R.C. 163.52(A) provides: "The failure of an acquiring agency to satisfy a requirement of section 163.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.