In every case of conviction under sections 2151.01 to 2151.54 of the Revised Code, where imprisonment is imposed as part of the punishment, the juvenile judge may suspend sentence, before or during commitment, upon such condition as the juvenile judge imposes. In the case of conviction for nonsupport of a child who is receiving aid under Chapter 5107. of the Revised Code, if the juvenile judge suspends sentence on condition that the person make payments for support, the payment shall be made to the county department of job and family services rather than to the child or custodian of the child.
The court, in accordance with sections 3119.29 to 3119.56 of the Revised Code, shall include in each support order made under this section the requirement that one or both of the parents provide for the health care needs of the child to the satisfaction of the court.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1965–2019 · leading case: In re Cross, 96 Ohio St. 3d 328 (Ohio 2002).
In re Cross, 96 Ohio St. 3d 328 (Ohio 2002). “The probationary period can be indefinite. The threat of actual incarceration, however, lasts only as long as the probation lasts.”
In re Cross, 2002 Ohio 4183 (Ohio 2002). “The probationary period can be indefinite. The threat of actual incarceration, however, lasts only as long as the probation lasts.”
Reissig v. Gruber (In Re Gruber), 436 B.R. 39 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2010). “03 of the Revised Code, or issuing an order described in division (C) or (D) of that section, the court or child support enforcement agency shall require that support payments be made to the office of child support in the department of job and family services as trustee for…”
In Re Bracewell, 709 N.E.2d 938 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998). “…1997 WL 438233 ; In re Proctor (Dec. 24, 1997), Summit App. No. 18257, unreported, 1997 WL 803086 . 25 . See R.C. 2151.49; In re Proctor, supra.”
In re J.H., 2019 Ohio 4510 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “] ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR III THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT THE AGENCY MADE REASONABLE EFFORTS AS IT PERTAINS TO APPELLANT PURSUANT TO R.C. 2151.49[.] {¶12} This Court will address Father’s assignments of error together because one of his arguments is dispositive.”
Brueggeman v. Brueggeman, 518 N.E.2d 586 (Ohio Ct. App. 1987). “87 (137 Ohio Laws, Part I, 167), provided in part: “(A) Upon entering a support order, the court shall, upon the request of either party or the court’s own motion or when required by court rule, require that support payments be made to the bureau of support as trustee for…”
Anderson v. Anderson, 212 N.E.2d 643 (Ohio Ct. App. 1965). · cites it 3ד* * *” Section 2151.49 of the Revised Code provides: “In every case of conviction under Sections 2151.”
Soukup v. Kirchner, 2013 Ohio 2818 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “03 of the Revised Code, or issuing an order described in division (C) or (D) of that section, the court or child support enforcement agency shall require that support payments be made to the office of child support in the department of job and family services as trustee for…”
Wheeler v. Wheeler, 500 N.E.2d 917 (Ohio Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2ד21(A), in its 1981 form (see 138 Ohio Laws, Part II, 3478), stated: “In any action where support is ordered under Chapter 3115 or under section 2151.49, 3105.18, 3105.21, 3109.05, 3111.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.