Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2305
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.114 (2026)

Partial birth feticide actions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
March 22, 2019
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 145 - 132nd General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

A civil action pursuant to section 2307.53 of the Revised Code for partial birth feticide or dismemberment feticide shall be commenced within one year after the commission of the offense.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2024–2026 · leading case: Weidman v. Hildebrandt, 2024 Ohio 2931 (Ohio 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Weidman v. Hildebrandt, 2024 Ohio 2931 (Ohio 2024). “111(B)(1) and (2) (cause of action for a claim of assault or battery accrues on the date the alleged assault or battery occurs, unless the plaintiff did not know the identity of the tortfeasor); R.C. 2305.114 (civil action for partial-birth feticide or dismemberment feticide…”
Weidman v. Hildebrandt, 2024 Ohio 2931 (Ohio 2024). · cites it 2× “111(B)(1) and (2) (cause of action for a claim of assault or battery accrues on the date the alleged assault or battery occurs, unless the plaintiff did not know the identity of the tortfeasor); R.C. 2305.114 (civil action for partial-birth feticide or dismemberment feticide…”
DG Gas, LLC, et al. v. TA Franchise Sys., LLC, et al. (N.D. Ohio 2026). · cites it 2× “2015), the court addressed whether the plaintiff timely filed a medical malpractice claim pursuant to O.R.C. § 2305.114(b) (requiring a plaintiff who “is considering bringing an action” to notify the defendant).”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.114(b) — 1 case
DG Gas, LLC, et al. v. TA Franchise Sys., LLC, et al. (N.D. Ohio 2026). “2015), the court addressed whether the plaintiff timely filed a medical malpractice claim pursuant to O.R.C. § 2305.114(b) (requiring a plaintiff who “is considering bringing an action” to notify the defendant).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.