Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 2505
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.05 (2026)

Notice of appeal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
March 17, 1987
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 412 - 116th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

The notice of appeal described in section 2505.04 of the Revised Code shall conform, in the case of an appeal of a final order, judgment, or decree of a court, with the Rules of Appellate Procedure or the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and shall designate, in the case of an administrative-related appeal, the final order appealed from and whether the appeal is on questions of law or questions of law and fact. In the notice, the party appealing shall be designated the appellant, and the adverse party, the appellee. In the case of an administrative-related appeal, the failure to designate the type of hearing upon appeal is not jurisdictional, and the notice of appeal may be amended with the approval of the appellate court for good cause shown.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 38 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1954–2026 · leading case: Woods v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 455 N.E.2d 709 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Woods v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 455 N.E.2d 709 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 6× “2505.01 to 2505.45, unless modified by R.C. 2506.”
Thomas v. Webber, 239 N.E.2d 26 (Ohio 1968). · cites it 6× “” Section 2505.05, Revised Code, reads in part: “The notice of appeal * * * shall designate the order, judgment, or decree appealed from * * *.”
AT&T Commc'ns of Ohio, Inc. v. Lynch, 2012 Ohio 1975 (Ohio 2012). “04 provides, “An appeal is perfected when a written notice of appeal is filed * * R.C. 2505.05 directs, “The notice of appeal described in section 2505.”
State Ex Rel. Arcadia Acres v. Ohio Dep't of Job & Fam. Servs., 2009 Ohio 4176 (Ohio 2009). “2d 709 (naming wrong party as appellee in contravention of R.C. 2505.05 was not a jurisdictional defect inasmuch as appeal requirements should be “liberally construed so as not to deny an appeal on technical grounds”).”
Diversified Mortg. Investors, Inc. v. Athens Cnty. Bd. of Revision, 454 N.E.2d 1330 (Ohio Ct. App. 1982). “It shall determine the taxable value of the property whose valuation or assessment for taxation by the county board of revision is complained of * * The appellants argue that a hearing was required under R.”
In Re Est. of Verbeck, 180 N.E.2d 615 (Ohio Ct. App. 1961). · cites it 4× “42, Revised Code. The notice of appeal is the jurisdictional act and has been carefully designed to avoid defeating the right to review on technical procedural grounds.”
Moore v. City of Cleveland Civil Serv. Comm'n, 465 N.E.2d 482 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 6× “04 and R.C. 2505.05.” See, also, Thomas v. Webber (1968), 15 Ohio St.”
Liberty Sav. Bank v. Kettering, 655 N.E.2d 1322 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995). “” R.C. 2505.05. For appeals on questions of law and fact, the code provides: “[N]o administrative-related appeal shall be effective os an appeal upon questions of law and fact until the final order appealed is superseded by a bond in the amount and with the conditions provided…”
Park Inv. Co. v. Bd. of Revision, 179 N.E.2d 784 (Ohio Ct. App. 1962). · cites it 2× “n relates to a constitutional question of uniformity of taxation (Article XIY, Amendments, federal Constitution, and Section 2 of Article XII of the Ohio Constitution) and is one for a court of law to resolve; that the failure to designate the type of hearing upon appeal is not…”
Baron v. Civ. Serv. Bd. of Dayton, 2012 Ohio 6179 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). “R.C. 2505.05 provides that a notice of appeal of an administrative decision “shall designate * * * whether the appeal is on questions of law or questions of law and fact.”
Lucio v. Safe Auto Ins., 2010 Ohio 2528 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). “54(B) language is required, because the multiple-claim portion of the rule deals only with the situation where one claim has been finally decided and the other remains pending, whereas here both claims were partially ruled upon with the final relief on both claims pending.”
Tsiperson v. Ohio Dept. of Com., 2012 Ohio 1048 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “R.C. 2505.05 allows a notice of appeal to be modified at the discretion of the court once the appeal has been timely perfected.”
Show all 38 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.05(A) — 1 case
State v. Rebholz, 2014 Ohio 2429 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.05(B) — 1 case
Johnson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., Co., 2024 Ohio 3187 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2505.05(B)(5) — 1 case
Lucio v. Safe Auto Ins., 2010 Ohio 2528 (Ohio Ct. App. 2010). “54(B) language is required, because the multiple-claim portion of the rule deals only with the situation where one claim has been finally decided and the other remains pending, whereas here both claims were partially ruled upon with the final relief on both claims pending.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.