(A)(1) In a case involving a felony or a violation of section 2903.11, 2903.12, or 2903.13 of the Revised Code when the victim of the offense is a peace officer, the judge or magistrate shall fix the amount of bail.
(2) In a case involving a misdemeanor or a violation of a municipal ordinance and not involving a felony or a violation of section 2903.11, 2903.12, or 2903.13 of the Revised Code when the victim of the offense is a peace officer, the judge, magistrate, or clerk of the court may fix the amount of bail and may do so in accordance with a schedule previously fixed by the judge or magistrate. If the judge, magistrate, or clerk of the court is not readily available, the sheriff, deputy sheriff, marshal, deputy marshal, police officer, or jailer having custody of the person charged may fix the amount of bail in accordance with a schedule previously fixed by the judge or magistrate and shall take the bail only in the county courthouse, the municipal or township building, or the county or municipal jail.
(3) In all cases, the bail shall be fixed with consideration of the seriousness of the offense charged, the previous criminal record of the defendant, and the probability of the defendant appearing at the trial of the case.
(B) In any case involving an alleged violation of section 2903.211 of the Revised Code or of a municipal ordinance that is substantially similar to that section, the court shall determine whether it will order an evaluation of the mental condition of the defendant pursuant to section 2919.271 of the Revised Code and, if it decides to so order, shall issue the order requiring the evaluation before it sets bail for the person charged with the violation. In any case involving an alleged violation of section 2919.27 of the Revised Code or of a municipal ordinance that is substantially similar to that section and in which the court finds that either of the following criteria applies, the court shall determine whether it will order an evaluation of the mental condition of the defendant pursuant to section 2919.271 of the Revised Code and, if it decides to so order, shall issue the order requiring that evaluation before it sets bail for the person charged with the violation:
(1) Regarding an alleged violation of a protection order issued or consent agreement approved pursuant to section 2919.26 or 3113.31 of the Revised Code, that the violation allegedly involves conduct by the defendant that caused physical harm to the person or property of a family or household member covered by the order or agreement or conduct by that defendant that caused a family or household member to believe that the defendant would cause physical harm to that member or that member's property;
(2) Regarding an alleged violation of a protection order issued pursuant to section 2903.213 or 2903.214 of the Revised Code, or a protection order issued by a court of another state, as defined in section 2919.27 of the Revised Code, that the violation allegedly involves conduct by the defendant that caused physical harm to the person or property of the person covered by the order or conduct by that defendant that caused the person covered by the order to believe that the defendant would cause physical harm to that person or that person's property.
(C) As used in this section, "peace officer" has the same meaning as in section 2935.01 of the Revised Code.
The Legislative Service Commission presents the text of this section as a composite of the section as amended by multiple acts of the General Assembly. This presentation recognizes the principle stated in R.C. 1.52(B) that amendments are to be harmonized if reasonably capable of simultaneous operation.
DuBose v. McGuffey (Slip Opinion), 2022 Ohio 8 (Ohio 2022). · cites it 2ד) Compare R.C. 2937.23(A)(3) (“In all cases, the bail shall be fixed with consideration of the seriousness of the offense charged, the previous criminal record of the defendant, and the probability of the defendant appearing at the trial of the case”).”
State v. Patterson, 673 N.E.2d 1001 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2דConstitution: Ohio Criminal Rule 46; and Ohio Revised Code Section 2937.23.” In support of this assignment of error, Patterson argues that the trial court erred in setting his pretrial bond at an excessive amount.”
Mohamed v. Eckelberry (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 4585 (Ohio 2020). “14 January Term, 2020 Compare R.C. 2937.23(A)(3) (“In all cases, the bail shall be fixed with consideration of the seriousness of the offense charged, the previous criminal record of the defendant, and the probability of the defendant appearing at the trial of the case”).”
In Re Gentry, 454 N.E.2d 987 (Ohio Ct. App. 1982). “That in determining the amount of bail to be fixed, the standards set forth in R.C. 2937.23 and Crim. R. 46 (F) must be applied.”
State v. Sanders, 2017 Ohio 8088 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “231 of the Revised Code, and render a judgment against the defendant for such costs.”
State v. Chionchio, 2013 Ohio 4296 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). ““Indeed, pursuant to R.C. 2937.23, the imposition of costs is mandatory * * *” absent waiver under certain circumstances.”
Johns v. Wasylyshyn, 2016 Ohio 564 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “” Additionally, in determining the types, amounts, and conditions of bail, Crim.”
State v. Wilhelm, 2024 Ohio 5606 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “The trial court ordered Wilhelm held without bond pending the completion of a mental evaluation pursuant to R.C. 2937.23(B). {¶3} On December 9, 2020, Wilhelm filed a motion for surety bond and mental evaluation.”
State v. Schillinger, 2018 Ohio 3966 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). ““Indeed, pursuant to R.C. 2937.23, the imposition of costs is mandatory * * *" absent waiver under certain circumstances.”
Savage v. Sigsworth, 2024 Ohio 5138 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 3דThe latter statute applies to the imposition of “pretrial release” conditions, which is the situation presented here. For the record though, we note that the two statutes contain similar criteria.”
Walls v. Sigsworth, 2019 Ohio 333 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2דIf we find that the trial court has abused its discretion, we must reset the bond at a reasonable amount, taking into account the factors set forth in R.C. 2937.23(A)(3) and Crim.R. 46(C). Hamilton v.”
State v. S.D.D., 2023 Ohio 4040 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2ד222, R.C. 2937.23, R.C. 2937.32, and Crim.R. 46.”
DuBose v. McGuffey (Slip Opinion), 2022 Ohio 8 (Ohio 2022). “) Compare R.C. 2937.23(A)(3) (“In all cases, the bail shall be fixed with consideration of the seriousness of the offense charged, the previous criminal record of the defendant, and the probability of the defendant appearing at the trial of the case”).”
Mohamed v. Eckelberry (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 4585 (Ohio 2020). “14 January Term, 2020 Compare R.C. 2937.23(A)(3) (“In all cases, the bail shall be fixed with consideration of the seriousness of the offense charged, the previous criminal record of the defendant, and the probability of the defendant appearing at the trial of the case”).”
Johns v. Wasylyshyn, 2016 Ohio 564 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “” Additionally, in determining the types, amounts, and conditions of bail, Crim.”
Walls v. Sigsworth, 2019 Ohio 333 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). “If we find that the trial court has abused its discretion, we must reset the bond at a reasonable amount, taking into account the factors set forth in R.C. 2937.23(A)(3) and Crim.R. 46(C). Hamilton v.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2937.23(B) — 1 case
State v. Wilhelm, 2024 Ohio 5606 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “The trial court ordered Wilhelm held without bond pending the completion of a mental evaluation pursuant to R.C. 2937.23(B). {¶3} On December 9, 2020, Wilhelm filed a motion for surety bond and mental evaluation.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 2937.23(B)(3) — 1 case
Savage v. Sigsworth, 2024 Ohio 5138 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “The latter statute applies to the imposition of “pretrial release” conditions, which is the situation presented here. For the record though, we note that the two statutes contain similar criteria.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.