(A) If the existence of the father and child relationship is declared or if paternity or a duty of support has been adjudicated under sections 3111.01 to 3111.18 of the Revised Code or under prior law, the obligation of the father may be enforced in the same or other proceedings by the mother, the child, the caretaker of the child, or the public authority that has furnished or may furnish the reasonable expenses of pregnancy, confinement, education, support, or funeral, or by any other person, including a private agency, to the extent that any of them may furnish, has furnished, or is furnishing these expenses.
(B) The court may order support payments to be made to the mother, the clerk of the court, the caretaker, or a person or agency designated to administer them for the benefit of the child under the supervision of the court.
(C) Willful failure to obey the judgment or order of the court is a civil contempt of the court.
Cuyahoga Support Enf't Agency v. Guthrie, 705 N.E.2d 318 (Ohio 1999). · cites it 5ד13 and division (B) of section 3111.15 of the Revised Code, except that a court entering a judgment or order for the payment of a lump sum or the purchase of an annuity under division (D) of section 3111.”
Seegert v. Zietlow, 642 N.E.2d 697 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 3דMoreover, case law from the appellate courts of this state has interpreted R.C. 3111.15 and its predecessor, former R.”
Dawson v. Dawson, 2009 Ohio 6029 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 3דIn particular, Stephanie and Timothy claim that Jon’s right to receive child support from Timothy was barred by the doctrines of estoppel, waiver, laches, claim -17- Case No.”
In re S.K.L., 2016 Ohio 2826 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 3ד13 (support and parenting time) and division (B) of R.C. 3111.15 (annuity for support); and (3) a judgment or order for the purchase of an annuity under division (D) of R.”
State Ex Rel. Donovan v. Zajac, 708 N.E.2d 254 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2דFurthermore, R.C. 3111.15(A) provides that after a man is determined to be the father of a child, the father’s child support obligation may be enforced in the same, or another, proceeding, by the mother, the child, or the public authority that had furnished support for the child.”
Payne v. Cartee, 676 N.E.2d 946 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996). “In addition, R.C. 3111.15(A) expressly states that a father’s obligations may be enforced by the child or a public authority that has furnished the reasonable expenses of pregnancy, confinement or support in the same proceeding that determined parentage.”
In re Adoption of Sunderhaus, 585 N.E.2d 418 (Ohio 1992). “” Additionally, R.C. 3111.15(A) supports the theory that the legal obligations of the putative father do not arise until a parentage determination is made, by stating: “If the existence of the father and child relationship is declared or if paternity or a duty of support has…”
Gatlin v. Harmon, 2021 Ohio 1852 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2דASSIGNMENT OF ERROR THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION WHEN IT DENIED MOTHER RETROACTIVE CHILD SUPPORT PURSUANT TO ORC §3111.15 AND THE TRIAL COURT’S DETERMINATION THAT FATHER HAS SATISFIED HIS RETROACTIVE CHILD SUPPORT OBLIGATION WAS AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE…”
Frazier v. Daniels, 693 N.E.2d 289 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2דDaniels argues that Frazier has received over $130,000 5 in child support, and thus an award of retroactive child support, under these circumstances, would be inequitable, unjust, and inappropriate.”
Brightwell v. Easter, 638 N.E.2d 1067 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2דR.C. 3111.15(A) provides that the father’s obligation may be enforced by the public authority that has furnished the reasonable expenses of pregnancy and support in the same action that determined parentage.”
Vance v. Banks, 640 N.E.2d 1214 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2ד19 of the Revised Code or under prior law, the obligation of the father may be enforced in the same or other proceedings by the mother, the child, or the public authority that has furnished or may furnish the reasonable expenses of pregnancy, confinement, education, support, or…”
In Re Harbour, 227 B.R. 131 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1998). “13 at the time she filed her petition and to enforce any such judgment under § 3111.15. Notwithstanding this Court’s prior decision in Davis , the debtor argues that the more enlightened trend among states other than Ohio is to determine that back child support is not property…”
Seegert v. Zietlow, 642 N.E.2d 697 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994). “Moreover, case law from the appellate courts of this state has interpreted R.C. 3111.15 and its predecessor, former R.”
State Ex Rel. Donovan v. Zajac, 708 N.E.2d 254 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998). “Furthermore, R.C. 3111.15(A) provides that after a man is determined to be the father of a child, the father’s child support obligation may be enforced in the same, or another, proceeding, by the mother, the child, or the public authority that had furnished support for the child.”
Payne v. Cartee, 676 N.E.2d 946 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996). “In addition, R.C. 3111.15(A) expressly states that a father’s obligations may be enforced by the child or a public authority that has furnished the reasonable expenses of pregnancy, confinement or support in the same proceeding that determined parentage.”
In re Adoption of Sunderhaus, 585 N.E.2d 418 (Ohio 1992). “” Additionally, R.C. 3111.15(A) supports the theory that the legal obligations of the putative father do not arise until a parentage determination is made, by stating: “If the existence of the father and child relationship is declared or if paternity or a duty of support has…”
Brightwell v. Easter, 638 N.E.2d 1067 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994). “R.C. 3111.15(A) provides that the father’s obligation may be enforced by the public authority that has furnished the reasonable expenses of pregnancy and support in the same action that determined parentage.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3111.15(B) — 1 case
Cuyahoga Support Enf't Agency v. Guthrie, 705 N.E.2d 318 (Ohio 1999). “13 and division (B) of section 3111.15 of the Revised Code, except that a court entering a judgment or order for the payment of a lump sum or the purchase of an annuity under division (D) of section 3111.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.