Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.31 (2026)

Providing list of any group health insurance policies, contracts, or plans available to the party

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In any action or proceeding in which a court or child support enforcement agency is determining the person responsible for the health care coverage of the children who are or will be the subject of a child support order, each party shall provide to the court or child support enforcement agency a list of any group health insurance policies, contracts, or plans available to the party and the cost of coverage under the available policies, contracts, or plans.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2012–2025 · leading case: Schierbaum v. Ohio Dept. of Edn., 2024 Ohio 1196 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Schierbaum v. Ohio Dept. of Edn., 2024 Ohio 1196 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “Schierbaum engaged in a pattern of conduct that violated the appropriate boundaries between a student and coach and was unbecoming to his position in violation of R.C. 3119.31(B)(1). Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it 11 determined…”
Albers v. Albers, 2012 Ohio 3838 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). “” The test for a violation of R.C. 3119.31(A) is thus retrospective, and a violation is predicated on conduct involving a single victim.”
In re J.C., 2025 Ohio 4855 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025). “Medical Support findings: The Court [finds] that the father and mother submitted the Private Health Insurance Questionnaires providing a list of any private health insurance policies, contracts or plans available to them pursuant to R.C. 3119.31. The presumption that the mother,…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.31(A) — 1 case
Albers v. Albers, 2012 Ohio 3838 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). “” The test for a violation of R.C. 3119.31(A) is thus retrospective, and a violation is predicated on conduct involving a single victim.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3119.31(B)(1) — 1 case
Schierbaum v. Ohio Dept. of Edn., 2024 Ohio 1196 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). “Schierbaum engaged in a pattern of conduct that violated the appropriate boundaries between a student and coach and was unbecoming to his position in violation of R.C. 3119.31(B)(1). Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it 11 determined…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.