Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 3125 - Ohio Revised Code | Ohio Laws
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 3125.07 (2026)

Statewide automated data processing system

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
March 22, 2001
Latest Legislation:
Senate Bill 180 - 123rd General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

The department of job and family services shall establish and maintain a statewide, automated data processing system in compliance with Title IV-D of the "Social Security Act," 88 Stat. 2351 (1975), 42 U.S.C. 651, as amended, to support the enforcement of child support that shall be implemented in every county. Every county shall accept the automated system and, in accordance with the written instructions of the department for the implementation of the automated system, shall convert to the automated system all records that are maintained by any county entity and that are related to any case for which a local agency is enforcing a child support order in accordance with Title IV-D of the "Social Security Act," 88 Stat. 2351 (1975), 42 U.S.C. 651, as amended.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2017–2021 · leading case: Delaware Cty. Child Support Enf't Agency v. Kise, 2021 Ohio 915 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Delaware Cty. Child Support Enf't Agency v. Kise, 2021 Ohio 915 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “R.C. 3125.07 codifies the directive to create the Support Enforcement Tracking System (“SETS”) used by all Ohio county child support enforcement agencies: The department of job and family services shall establish and maintain a statewide, automated data processing system in…”
Schuman v. Dept. of Job & Fam. Servs., 2017 Ohio 5770 (Ohio Ct. Cl. 2017). · cites it 2× “892 of the Revised Code into the new hires directory, which shall be part of or accessible to the automated data processing system required pursuant to section 3125.07 of the Revised Code.” R.C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.