Go Syfert

Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 3319.083 (2026)

Notice of intention not to re-employ

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Effective:

August 5, 1981

Latest Legislation:

House Bill 1 - 114th General Assembly

PDF:

Download Authenticated PDF

In all school districts wherein the provisions of Chapter 124. of the Revised Code do not apply, each board of education shall cause notice to be given of its intention not to re-employ said non-teaching employee, at the expiration of his contract. If such notice is not given the non-teaching school employee on or before the first day of June, said employee shall be deemed re-employed.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1989 · leading case: Blair v. Milford Exempted Vill. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 575 N.E.2d 1190 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Blair v. Milford Exempted Vill. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 575 N.E.2d 1190 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 4× “R.C. 3319.083. If the school board decides to renew an employee’s contract at the end of the two-year period, that employee achieves continuing contract status.”

Ferdinand v. Hamilton Local Bd. of Educ., 478 N.E.2d 835 (Ohio Ct. App. 1984). “There is no evidence adduced as to whether there were nonteaching employees under limited contracts which would expire at the end of the school year and which could be nonrenewed pursuant to R.C. 3319.083 so as to accomplish the alleged economy efforts.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.