Go Syfert

Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 3327.06 (2026)

Tuition - unauthorized attendance

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Effective:

April 25, 1990

Latest Legislation:

House Bill 341 - 118th General Assembly

PDF:

Download Authenticated PDF

(A) When a pupil attends school pursuant to section 3327.04 of the Revised Code in a district other than the district in which he is entitled to attend school pursuant to division (B) or (F) of section 3313.64 or section 3313.65 of the Revised Code, tuition for such attendance shall be credited and paid in the manner provided in section 3317.08 of the Revised Code.

(B) When the board of education of a city, exempted village, or local school district admits to the schools of its district any pupil who is not entitled to be admitted to the district's schools under division (B) or (F) of section 3313.64 or section 3313.645 or 3313.65 of the Revised Code for whose attendance tuition is not an obligation of the board of another district of this state, such board shall collect tuition for the attendance of such pupil from the parents or guardian of the pupil, and the amount of tuition collected shall be the amount computed in the manner prescribed by section 3317.08 of the Revised Code. When neither the pupil nor his parents reside in this state, the amount of tuition collected shall be the amount computed in the manner prescribed by section 3317.081 or 3323.141 of the Revised Code.

(C) If a board admits to the schools of its districts any nonresident pupil for whose attendance tuition is not an obligation of the board of another district of this state or of a home as defined in section 3313.64 of the Revised Code and fails to collect tuition as required by division (B) of this section from the pupil's parents or guardian, the attendance of such pupil is unauthorized attendance.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1959–2012 · leading case: In Re Dembek, 64 B.R. 745 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1986).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Dembek, 64 B.R. 745 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1986). · cites it 7× “Notwithstanding, that policy must be contrued in the clear light of O.R.C. 3327.06, which provides forthrightly that despite its grant of authority to individual school boards to form policy for all pupils, tuition for nonresident pupils is to be paid for by parents or guardians…”

In Re White, 715 N.E.2d 203 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 3× “In that case, tuition is to be paid by the student’s parents or guardian. R.C. 3317.08 also permits a board to admit a student whose admission is not required, if tuition is paid.”

Bd. of Educ. of City Sch. Dist. v. Dille, 165 N.E.2d 807 (Ohio Ct. App. 1959). · cites it 2× “The Court of Common Pleas held that under the provisions of Section 3327.06, Revised Code, plaintiff had made an election and thereby fixed the attendance status of Carol Dille as being “unauthorized attendance,” and accepted the legal results flowing from such status.”

Shaker Heights City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Cloud, 738 N.E.2d 473 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 3× “” Shaker Heights contends that the court erred when it dismissed the action because R.C. 3327.06 vests the court with jurisdiction to consider school board tuition cases and fraud is a matter within the jurisdiction of the common pleas court.”

Integrated Payment Sys., Inc. v. A & M, Inc., 2012 Ohio 1643 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012). “Accordingly, the Koukios case notwithstanding, I disagree that R.”

— Ohio Rev. Code § 3327.06(B) — 2 cases

In Re White, 715 N.E.2d 203 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998). “In that case, tuition is to be paid by the student’s parents or guardian. R.C. 3317.08 also permits a board to admit a student whose admission is not required, if tuition is paid.”

Shaker Heights City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Cloud, 738 N.E.2d 473 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). “” Shaker Heights contends that the court erred when it dismissed the action because R.C. 3327.06 vests the court with jurisdiction to consider school board tuition cases and fraud is a matter within the jurisdiction of the common pleas court.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.