Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 4111
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4111.99 (2026)

Penalty

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) Whoever violates division (A) or (D) of section 4111.13 of the Revised Code is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree.

(B) Whoever violates division (B) or (C) of section 4111.13 of the Revised Code is guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.

(C) Whoever violates section 4111.17 of the Revised Code is guilty of a minor misdemeanor.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2023 · leading case: White v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 837 N.E.2d 1275 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
White v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 837 N.E.2d 1275 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005). “R.C. 4111.99(A). {¶ 27} Similar to MSWA, the FLSA gives the Secretary of Labor the power to investigate any employer to determine whether that employer has failed to make and keep accurate employee time records.”
Harris v. Ohnh Emp, L.L.C., 2015 Ohio 3212 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015). “Assuming without deciding that a civil cause of action exists under the statute, see R.C. 4111.99(B) (authorizing criminal penalties for a violation), we see no requirement in the statute that a plaintiff must first be entitled to overtime compensation in order for the plaintiff…”
Ballard v. Beverly Enter., Inc., 667 N.E.2d 993 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995). “These employers might also be guilty of misdemeanors for these wage violations under R.C. 4111.99(A). R.C. 1.47(C), which codifies the presumption that statutory enactments are intended to accomplish just and reasonable results, proscribes such an interpretation of R.”
Oglesby v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc. (S.D. Ohio 2023). “She further contends that Defendant's motion to strike Count IV should be overruled, since the law of the case applies, and the 5 Although Ohio Revised Code § 4111.99(B) and § 4111.13(C) provide for criminal penalties for any employer who fails to pay an employee overtime under…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4111.99(A) — 2 cases
White v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 837 N.E.2d 1275 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005). “R.C. 4111.99(A). {¶ 27} Similar to MSWA, the FLSA gives the Secretary of Labor the power to investigate any employer to determine whether that employer has failed to make and keep accurate employee time records.”
Ballard v. Beverly Enter., Inc., 667 N.E.2d 993 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995). “These employers might also be guilty of misdemeanors for these wage violations under R.C. 4111.99(A). R.C. 1.47(C), which codifies the presumption that statutory enactments are intended to accomplish just and reasonable results, proscribes such an interpretation of R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4111.99(B) — 2 cases
Harris v. Ohnh Emp, L.L.C., 2015 Ohio 3212 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015). “Assuming without deciding that a civil cause of action exists under the statute, see R.C. 4111.99(B) (authorizing criminal penalties for a violation), we see no requirement in the statute that a plaintiff must first be entitled to overtime compensation in order for the plaintiff…”
Oglesby v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc. (S.D. Ohio 2023). “She further contends that Defendant's motion to strike Count IV should be overruled, since the law of the case applies, and the 5 Although Ohio Revised Code § 4111.99(B) and § 4111.13(C) provide for criminal penalties for any employer who fails to pay an employee overtime under…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.