Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 4113 - Ohio Revised Code | Ohio Laws
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61 (2026)

Time limitations for payments to subcontractors and materialmen

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
September 29, 2011
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 153 - 129th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

(A)(1) If a subcontractor or material supplier submits an application or request for payment or an invoice for materials to a contractor in sufficient time to allow the contractor to include the application, request, or invoice in the contractor's own pay request submitted to an owner, the contractor, within ten calendar days after receipt of payment from the owner for improvements to property, shall pay to the:

(a) Subcontractor, an amount that is equal to the percentage of completion of the subcontractor's contract allowed by the owner for the amount of labor or work performed;

(b) Material supplier, an amount that is equal to all or that portion of the invoice for materials which represents the materials furnished by the material supplier.

The contractor may reduce the amount paid by any retainage provision contained in the contract, invoice, or purchase order between the contractor and the subcontractor or material supplier, and may withhold amounts that may be necessary to resolve disputed liens or claims involving the work or labor performed or material furnished by the subcontractor or material supplier.

If the contractor fails to comply with division (A)(1) of this section, the contractor shall pay the subcontractor or material supplier, in addition to the payment due, interest in the amount of eighteen per cent per annum of the payment due, beginning on the eleventh day following the receipt of payment from the owner and ending on the date of full payment of the payment due plus interest to the subcontractor or material supplier.

(2) If a lower tier subcontractor or lower tier material supplier submits an application or request for payment or an invoice for materials to a subcontractor, material supplier, or other lower tier subcontractor or lower tier material supplier in sufficient time to allow the subcontractor, material supplier, or other lower tier subcontractor or lower tier material supplier to include the application, request, or invoice in the subcontractor's, material supplier's, or other lower tier subcontractor's or lower tier material supplier's own pay request submitted to a contractor, other subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier, the subcontractor, material supplier, or other lower tier subcontractor or lower tier material supplier, within ten calendar days after receipt of payment from the contractor, other subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier for improvements to property, shall pay to the:

(a) Lower tier subcontractor, an amount that is equal to the percentage of completion of the lower tier subcontractor's contract allowed by the owner for the amount of labor or work performed;

(b) Lower tier material supplier, an amount that is equal to all or that portion of the invoice for materials which represents the materials furnished by the lower tier material supplier.

The subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier may reduce the amount paid by any retainage provision contained in the contract, invoice, or purchase order between the subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier and the lower tier subcontractor or lower tier material supplier, and may withhold amounts that may be necessary to resolve disputed liens or claims involving the work or labor performed or material furnished by the lower tier subcontractor or lower tier material supplier.

If the subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier fails to comply with division (A)(2) of this section, the subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier shall pay the lower tier subcontractor or lower tier material supplier, in addition to the payment due, interest in the amount of eighteen per cent per annum of the payment due, beginning on the eleventh day following the receipt of payment from the contractor, other subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier and ending on the date of full payment of the payment due plus interest to the lower tier subcontractor or lower tier material supplier.

(3) If a contractor receives any final retainage from the owner for improvements to property, the contractor shall pay from that retainage each subcontractor and material supplier the subcontractor's or material supplier's proportion of the retainage, within ten calendar days after receipt of the retainage from the owner, or within the time period provided in a contract, invoice, or purchase order between the contractor and the subcontractor or material supplier, whichever time period is shorter, provided that the contractor has determined that the subcontractor's or material supplier's work, labor, and materials have been satisfactorily performed or furnished and that the owner has approved the subcontractor's or material supplier's work, labor, and materials.

If the contractor fails to pay a subcontractor or material supplier within the appropriate time period, the contractor shall pay the subcontractor or material supplier, in addition to the retainage due, interest in the amount of eighteen per cent per annum of the retainage due, beginning on the eleventh day following the receipt of the retainage from the owner and ending on the date of full payment of the retainage due plus interest to the subcontractor or material supplier.

(4) If a subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier receives any final retainage from the contractor or other subcontractor, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier for improvements to property, the subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier shall pay from that retainage each lower tier subcontractor or lower tier the lower tier subcontractor's or lower tier material supplier's proportion of the retainage, within ten calendar days after receipt of payment from the contractor or other subcontractor, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier, or within the time period provided in a contract, invoice, or purchase order between the subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier and the lower tier subcontractor or lower tier material supplier, whichever time period is shorter, provided that the subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier has determined that the lower tier subcontractor's or lower tier material supplier's work, labor, and materials have been satisfactorily performed or furnished and that the owner has approved the lower tier subcontractor's or lower tier material supplier's work, labor, and materials.

If the subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier fails to pay the lower tier subcontractor or lower tier material supplier within the appropriate time period, the subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier shall pay the lower tier subcontractor or lower tier material supplier, in addition to the retainage due, interest in the amount of eighteen per cent per annum of the retainage due, beginning on the eleventh day following the receipt of the retainage from the contractor or other subcontractor, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier and ending on the date of full payment of the retainage due plus interest to the lower tier subcontractor or lower tier material supplier.

(5) A contractor, subcontractor, or lower tier subcontractor shall pay a laborer wages due within ten days of payment of any application or request for payment or the receipt of any retainage from an owner, contractor, subcontractor, or lower tier subcontractor.

If the contractor, subcontractor, or lower tier subcontractor fails to pay the laborer wages due within the appropriate time period, the contractor, subcontractor, or lower tier subcontractor shall pay the laborer, in addition to the wages due, interest in the amount of eighteen per cent per annum of the wages due, beginning on the eleventh day following the receipt of payment from the owner, contractor, subcontractor, or lower tier subcontractor and ending on the date of full payment of the wages due plus interest to the laborer.

(B)(1) If a contractor, subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier has not made payment in compliance with division (A)(1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) of this section within thirty days after payment is due, a subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, lower tier material supplier, or laborer may file a civil action to recover the amount due plus the interest provided in those divisions. If the court finds in the civil action that a contractor, subcontractor, material supplier, lower tier subcontractor, or lower tier material supplier has not made payment in compliance with those divisions, the court shall award the interest specified in those divisions, in addition to the amount due. Except as provided in division (B)(3) of this section, the court shall award the prevailing party reasonable attorney fees and court costs.

(2) In making a determination to award attorney fees under division (B)(1) of this section, the court shall consider all relevant factors, including but not limited to the following:

(a) The presence or absence of good faith allegations or defenses asserted by the parties;

(b) The proportion of the amount of recovery as it relates to the amount demanded;

(c) The nature of the services rendered and the time expended in rendering the services.

(3) The court shall not award attorney fees under division (B)(1) of this section if the court determines, following a hearing on the payment of attorney fees, that the payment of attorney fees to the prevailing party would be inequitable.

(C) This section does not apply to any construction or improvement of any single-, two-, or three-family detached dwelling houses.

(D)(1) No provision of this section regarding entitlement to interest, attorney fees, or court costs may be waived by agreement and any such term in any contract or agreement is void and unenforceable as against public policy.

(2) This section shall not be construed as impairing or affecting, in any way, the terms and conditions of any contract, invoice, purchase order, or any other agreement between a contractor and a subcontractor or a material supplier or between a subcontractor and another subcontractor, a material supplier, a lower tier subcontractor, or a lower tier material supplier, except that if such terms and conditions contain time periods which are longer than any of the time periods specified in divisions (A)(1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) of this section or interest at a percentage less than the interest stated in those divisions, then the provisions of this section shall prevail over such terms and conditions.

(E) Notwithstanding the definition of lower tier material supplier in this section, a person is not a lower tier material supplier unless the materials supplied by the person are:

(1) Furnished with the intent, as evidenced by the contract of sale, the delivery order, delivery to the site, or by other evidence that the materials are to be used on a particular structure or improvement;

(2) Incorporated in the improvement or consumed as normal wastage in the course of the improvement; or

(3) Specifically fabricated for incorporation in the improvement and not readily resalable in the ordinary course of the fabricator's business even if not actually incorporated in the improvement.

(F) As used in this section:

(1) "Contractor" means any person who undertakes to construct, alter, erect, improve, repair, demolish, remove, dig, or drill any part of a structure or improvement under a contract with an owner, a "construction manager" or "construction manager at risk" as those terms are defined in section 9.33 of the Revised Code, or a "design-build firm" as that term is defined in section 153.65 of the Revised Code.

(2) "Laborer," "material supplier," "subcontractor," and "wages" have the same meanings as in section 1311.01 of the Revised Code.

(3) "Lower tier subcontractor" means a subcontractor who is not in privity of contract with a contractor but is in privity of contract with another subcontractor.

(4) "Lower tier material supplier" means a material supplier who is not in privity of contract with a contractor but is in privity of contract with another subcontractor or a material supplier.

(5) "Wages due" means the wages due to a laborer as of the date a contractor or subcontractor receives payment for any application or request for payment or retainage from any owner, contractor, or subcontractor.

(6) "Owner" includes the state, and a county, township, municipal corporation, school district, or other political subdivision of the state, and any public agency, authority, board, commission, instrumentality, or special district of or in the state or a county, township, municipal corporation, school district, or other political subdivision of the state, and any officer or agent thereof and relates to all the interests either legal or equitable, which a person may have in the real estate upon which improvements are made, including interests held by any person under contracts of purchase, whether in writing or otherwise.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1996–2025 · leading case: Masiongale Elec.-Mech., Inc. v. Constr. One, Inc., 102 Ohio St. 3d 1 (Ohio 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Masiongale Elec.-Mech., Inc. v. Constr. One, Inc., 102 Ohio St. 3d 1 (Ohio 2004). · cites it 26× “{¶ 1} In this ease, we are called upon to interpret R.C. 4113.61, known as the Prompt-Payment Act, with respect to a contractor’s right to withhold payment from a subcontractor.”
Soloman v. Excel Mktg., Inc., 682 N.E.2d 724 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 17× “Soloman further argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion for a new trial and by failing to award him attorney fees, costs, and interest pursuant to R.C. 4113.61. We conclude that the Kettering Municipal Court erred by transferring venue to Springfield Municipal…”
Gary Moderalli Excavating, Inc. v. Trimat Constr., Inc., 2013 Ohio 1701 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 21× “THE TRIAL COURT ERRONEOUSLY DENIED PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM FOR 18% INTEREST AND ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS UNDER OHIO'S PROMPT PAYMENT ACT, O.R.C. 4113.61. THIS DECISION WAS CONTRARY TO THE JURY VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF, THE MANDATORY LANGUAGE OF THE STATUTE, AND WAS FURTHER AGAINST THE…”
Filo v. Liberato, 2013 Ohio 1014 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 12× “As Appellant’s fourth and fifth assignments of error both address the Prompt Payment Act, R.C. 4113.61, they will also be considered together.”
Thompson Thrift Constr. v. Lynn, 2017 Ohio 1530 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 4× “R.C. 4113.61(A)(2) permits the withholding of retainages from draw requests of lower tier subcontractors, but R.”
H & H Glass, Inc. v. Empire Bldg. Co., L.L.C., 2016 Ohio 3029 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 8× “H&H also asserted a prompt-pay claim under R.C. 4113.61, which included a request for attorney fees.”
Xtreme Elements, L.L.C. v. Foti Contracting, L.L.C., 2017 Ohio 254 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 19× “{¶27} If the contractor fails to comply with these provisions, the contractor must pay the subcontractor, “in addition to the payment due, interest in the amount of eighteen per cent per annum of the payment due, beginning on the eleventh day following the receipt of payment…”
Frank Novak & Sons, Inc. v. A-Team, L.L.C., 2014 Ohio 922 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 12× “Novak also cross-appeals, challenging the trial court’s judgment with respect to its claim under R.C. 4113.61 (“Ohio’s Prompt Payment Act”).”
Mécanique C.N.C., Inc. v. Durr Env't, Inc., 304 F. Supp. 2d 971 (S.D. Ohio 2004). · cites it 2× “In its Complaint, CNC alleges the following causes of action against Durr: (1) breach of contract; (2) delay, inefficiency, and increased overhead damages; (3) violation of section 4113.61 of the Ohio Revised Code; (4) quantum meruit and unjust enrichment; (5) wrongful…”
Atlas Piers NEO v. Summit Constr. Co., Inc., 2021 Ohio 2024 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 29× “Atlas further asserted that Summit failed to timely pay Atlas in violation of R.C. 4113.61. Summit answered and filed a counterclaim.”
Ohio Plumbing, Ltd. v. Fiorilli Constr., Inc., 2018 Ohio 1748 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). “{¶ 4} On May 30, 2017, Ohio Plumbing filed a complaint against Fiorilli in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, asserting claims of breach of contract and violation of the Ohio Prompt Payment Act, R.C. 4113.61, based on Fiorilli's alleged failure to pay Ohio Plumbing for…”
Carter Steel & Fabricating Co. v. Danis Bldg. Constr. Co., 710 N.E.2d 299 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998). “On June 9, 1997 Carter, filed a complaint against Danis in the Logan County Common Pleas Court for breach of contract and for damages under R.C. 4113.61, Ohio’s Prompt Payment Act. 3 Danis filed a motion to dismiss the action, or, in the alternative, to stay the proceedings…”
Show all 31 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(A) — 5 cases
Masiongale Elec.-Mech., Inc. v. Constr. One, Inc., 102 Ohio St. 3d 1 (Ohio 2004). “{¶ 1} In this ease, we are called upon to interpret R.C. 4113.61, known as the Prompt-Payment Act, with respect to a contractor’s right to withhold payment from a subcontractor.”
H & H Glass, Inc. v. Empire Bldg. Co., L.L.C., 2016 Ohio 3029 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “H&H also asserted a prompt-pay claim under R.C. 4113.61, which included a request for attorney fees.”
Frank Novak & Sons, Inc. v. A-Team, L.L.C., 2014 Ohio 922 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “Novak also cross-appeals, challenging the trial court’s judgment with respect to its claim under R.C. 4113.61 (“Ohio’s Prompt Payment Act”).”
Xtreme Elements, L.L.C. v. Foti Contracting, L.L.C., 2018 Ohio 3323 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
Atlas Indus. Contractors LLC v. In2Gro Tech. LLC (S.D. Ohio 2021).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(A)(1) — 12 cases
Masiongale Elec.-Mech., Inc. v. Constr. One, Inc., 102 Ohio St. 3d 1 (Ohio 2004). “{¶ 1} In this ease, we are called upon to interpret R.C. 4113.61, known as the Prompt-Payment Act, with respect to a contractor’s right to withhold payment from a subcontractor.”
Gary Moderalli Excavating, Inc. v. Trimat Constr., Inc., 2013 Ohio 1701 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “THE TRIAL COURT ERRONEOUSLY DENIED PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM FOR 18% INTEREST AND ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS UNDER OHIO'S PROMPT PAYMENT ACT, O.R.C. 4113.61. THIS DECISION WAS CONTRARY TO THE JURY VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF, THE MANDATORY LANGUAGE OF THE STATUTE, AND WAS FURTHER AGAINST THE…”
Filo v. Liberato, 2013 Ohio 1014 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “As Appellant’s fourth and fifth assignments of error both address the Prompt Payment Act, R.C. 4113.61, they will also be considered together.”
Frank Novak & Sons, Inc. v. A-Team, L.L.C., 2014 Ohio 922 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “Novak also cross-appeals, challenging the trial court’s judgment with respect to its claim under R.C. 4113.61 (“Ohio’s Prompt Payment Act”).”
Soloman v. Excel Mktg., Inc., 682 N.E.2d 724 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996). “Soloman further argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion for a new trial and by failing to award him attorney fees, costs, and interest pursuant to R.C. 4113.61. We conclude that the Kettering Municipal Court erred by transferring venue to Springfield Municipal…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(A)(1)(a) — 4 cases
H & H Glass, Inc. v. Empire Bldg. Co., L.L.C., 2016 Ohio 3029 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “H&H also asserted a prompt-pay claim under R.C. 4113.61, which included a request for attorney fees.”
Xtreme Elements, L.L.C. v. Foti Contracting, L.L.C., 2017 Ohio 254 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “{¶27} If the contractor fails to comply with these provisions, the contractor must pay the subcontractor, “in addition to the payment due, interest in the amount of eighteen per cent per annum of the payment due, beginning on the eleventh day following the receipt of payment…”
Xtreme Elements, L.L.C. v. Foti Contracting, L.L.C., 2018 Ohio 3323 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
Portage Exteriors v. Hein Constr., Inc., 2014 Ohio 2930 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(A)(1)(b) — 5 cases
Masiongale Elec.-Mech., Inc. v. Constr. One, Inc., 102 Ohio St. 3d 1 (Ohio 2004). “{¶ 1} In this ease, we are called upon to interpret R.C. 4113.61, known as the Prompt-Payment Act, with respect to a contractor’s right to withhold payment from a subcontractor.”
Michigan Timber & Truss, Inc. v. Summit Bldg. Servs., L.L.C., 2021 Ohio 3158 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
Xtreme Elements, L.L.C. v. Foti Contracting, L.L.C., 2017 Ohio 254 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “{¶27} If the contractor fails to comply with these provisions, the contractor must pay the subcontractor, “in addition to the payment due, interest in the amount of eighteen per cent per annum of the payment due, beginning on the eleventh day following the receipt of payment…”
Moosehead v. Eureka, 2019 Ohio 3961 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).
Xtreme Elements, L.L.C. v. Foti Contracting, L.L.C., 2018 Ohio 3323 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(A)(2) — 1 case
Thompson Thrift Constr. v. Lynn, 2017 Ohio 1530 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “R.C. 4113.61(A)(2) permits the withholding of retainages from draw requests of lower tier subcontractors, but R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(A)(2)(b) — 2 cases
Broadway Concrete Invests., L.L.C. v. Masonry Contracting Corp., 2022 Ohio 19 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Broadway Concrete Invests, L.L.C. v. Masonry Constracting Corp., 2022 Ohio 530 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(A)(2)(b)(5) — 1 case
RAM Constr. Servs. of Cleveland, LLC v. Key Constr., Inc. (N.D. Ohio 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(A)(3) — 2 cases
Thompson Thrift Constr. v. Lynn, 2017 Ohio 1530 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “R.C. 4113.61(A)(2) permits the withholding of retainages from draw requests of lower tier subcontractors, but R.”
Atlas Piers NEO v. Summit Constr. Co., Inc., 2021 Ohio 2024 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “Atlas further asserted that Summit failed to timely pay Atlas in violation of R.C. 4113.61. Summit answered and filed a counterclaim.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(B) — 5 cases
Masiongale Elec.-Mech., Inc. v. Constr. One, Inc., 102 Ohio St. 3d 1 (Ohio 2004). “{¶ 1} In this ease, we are called upon to interpret R.C. 4113.61, known as the Prompt-Payment Act, with respect to a contractor’s right to withhold payment from a subcontractor.”
Soloman v. Excel Mktg., Inc., 682 N.E.2d 724 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996). “Soloman further argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion for a new trial and by failing to award him attorney fees, costs, and interest pursuant to R.C. 4113.61. We conclude that the Kettering Municipal Court erred by transferring venue to Springfield Municipal…”
Atlas Piers NEO v. Summit Constr. Co., Inc., 2021 Ohio 2024 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “Atlas further asserted that Summit failed to timely pay Atlas in violation of R.C. 4113.61. Summit answered and filed a counterclaim.”
Xtreme Elements, L.L.C. v. Foti Contracting, L.L.C., 2018 Ohio 3323 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
Portage Exteriors v. Hein Constr., Inc., 2014 Ohio 2930 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(B)(1) — 10 cases
Gary Moderalli Excavating, Inc. v. Trimat Constr., Inc., 2013 Ohio 1701 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “THE TRIAL COURT ERRONEOUSLY DENIED PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM FOR 18% INTEREST AND ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS UNDER OHIO'S PROMPT PAYMENT ACT, O.R.C. 4113.61. THIS DECISION WAS CONTRARY TO THE JURY VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF, THE MANDATORY LANGUAGE OF THE STATUTE, AND WAS FURTHER AGAINST THE…”
Masiongale Elec.-Mech., Inc. v. Constr. One, Inc., 102 Ohio St. 3d 1 (Ohio 2004). “{¶ 1} In this ease, we are called upon to interpret R.C. 4113.61, known as the Prompt-Payment Act, with respect to a contractor’s right to withhold payment from a subcontractor.”
H & H Glass, Inc. v. Empire Bldg. Co., L.L.C., 2016 Ohio 3029 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016). “H&H also asserted a prompt-pay claim under R.C. 4113.61, which included a request for attorney fees.”
Xtreme Elements, L.L.C. v. Foti Contracting, L.L.C., 2017 Ohio 254 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “{¶27} If the contractor fails to comply with these provisions, the contractor must pay the subcontractor, “in addition to the payment due, interest in the amount of eighteen per cent per annum of the payment due, beginning on the eleventh day following the receipt of payment…”
Frank Novak & Sons, Inc. v. A-Team, L.L.C., 2014 Ohio 922 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “Novak also cross-appeals, challenging the trial court’s judgment with respect to its claim under R.C. 4113.61 (“Ohio’s Prompt Payment Act”).”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(B)(2) — 4 cases
Xtreme Elements, L.L.C. v. Foti Contracting, L.L.C., 2018 Ohio 3323 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
Atlas Piers NEO v. Summit Constr. Co., Inc., 2021 Ohio 2024 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “Atlas further asserted that Summit failed to timely pay Atlas in violation of R.C. 4113.61. Summit answered and filed a counterclaim.”
Broadway Concrete Invests., L.L.C. v. Masonry Contracting Corp., 2022 Ohio 19 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
Broadway Concrete Invests, L.L.C. v. Masonry Constracting Corp., 2022 Ohio 530 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(B)(2)(a) — 4 cases
Soloman v. Excel Mktg., Inc., 682 N.E.2d 724 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996). “Soloman further argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion for a new trial and by failing to award him attorney fees, costs, and interest pursuant to R.C. 4113.61. We conclude that the Kettering Municipal Court erred by transferring venue to Springfield Municipal…”
Xtreme Elements, L.L.C. v. Foti Contracting, L.L.C., 2018 Ohio 3323 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
Atlas Piers NEO v. Summit Constr. Co., Inc., 2021 Ohio 2024 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “Atlas further asserted that Summit failed to timely pay Atlas in violation of R.C. 4113.61. Summit answered and filed a counterclaim.”
Powell v. Divine Status LLC (S.D. Ohio 2025).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(B)(3) — 6 cases
Xtreme Elements, L.L.C. v. Foti Contracting, L.L.C., 2017 Ohio 254 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “{¶27} If the contractor fails to comply with these provisions, the contractor must pay the subcontractor, “in addition to the payment due, interest in the amount of eighteen per cent per annum of the payment due, beginning on the eleventh day following the receipt of payment…”
Gary Moderalli Excavating, Inc. v. Trimat Constr., Inc., 2013 Ohio 1701 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “THE TRIAL COURT ERRONEOUSLY DENIED PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM FOR 18% INTEREST AND ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS UNDER OHIO'S PROMPT PAYMENT ACT, O.R.C. 4113.61. THIS DECISION WAS CONTRARY TO THE JURY VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF, THE MANDATORY LANGUAGE OF THE STATUTE, AND WAS FURTHER AGAINST THE…”
Frank Novak & Sons, Inc. v. A-Team, L.L.C., 2014 Ohio 922 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “Novak also cross-appeals, challenging the trial court’s judgment with respect to its claim under R.C. 4113.61 (“Ohio’s Prompt Payment Act”).”
Xtreme Elements, L.L.C. v. Foti Contracting, L.L.C., 2018 Ohio 3323 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
Atlas Piers NEO v. Summit Constr. Co., Inc., 2021 Ohio 2024 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “Atlas further asserted that Summit failed to timely pay Atlas in violation of R.C. 4113.61. Summit answered and filed a counterclaim.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(F) — 1 case
Soloman v. Excel Mktg., Inc., 682 N.E.2d 724 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996). “Soloman further argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion for a new trial and by failing to award him attorney fees, costs, and interest pursuant to R.C. 4113.61. We conclude that the Kettering Municipal Court erred by transferring venue to Springfield Municipal…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(F)(1) — 2 cases
Gary Moderalli Excavating, Inc. v. Trimat Constr., Inc., 2013 Ohio 1701 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “THE TRIAL COURT ERRONEOUSLY DENIED PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM FOR 18% INTEREST AND ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS UNDER OHIO'S PROMPT PAYMENT ACT, O.R.C. 4113.61. THIS DECISION WAS CONTRARY TO THE JURY VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF, THE MANDATORY LANGUAGE OF THE STATUTE, AND WAS FURTHER AGAINST THE…”
Graves Lumber Co. v. Borkey, 2009 Ohio 2786 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(F)(2) — 1 case
Graves Lumber Co. v. Borkey, 2009 Ohio 2786 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(F)(3) — 1 case
Soloman v. Excel Mktg., Inc., 682 N.E.2d 724 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996). “Soloman further argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion for a new trial and by failing to award him attorney fees, costs, and interest pursuant to R.C. 4113.61. We conclude that the Kettering Municipal Court erred by transferring venue to Springfield Municipal…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4113.61(F)(6) — 1 case
Graves Lumber Co. v. Borkey, 2009 Ohio 2786 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.