Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4115.12 (2026)

Administrative rules for contractors and subcontractors

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In order to facilitate the administration of sections 4115.03 to 4115.16 of the Revised Code, and to achieve the purposes of those sections, the director of commerce may adopt reasonable rules, not inconsistent with those sections, for contractors and subcontractors engaged in the construction, prosecution, completion, or repair of a public improvement financed in whole or in part by any public authority.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1998–2011 · leading case: J.A. Croson Co. v. J.A. Guy, Inc., 81 Ohio St. 3d 346 (Ohio 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
J.A. Croson Co. v. J.A. Guy, Inc., 81 Ohio St. 3d 346 (Ohio 1998). “Code 4101:9-4-07, a regulation that was adopted by the Administrator of the Bureau of Employment Services pursuant to R.C. 4115.12. Ohio Adm.Code 4101:9-4-07(B)(6) makes it a violation of R.”
Vaughn Indus., Inc. v. Dimech Servs., 856 N.E.2d 312 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006). “R.C. 4115.12 provides that in order to facilitate the administration of the prevailing-wage laws “and to achieve the purposes of those sections, the director of commerce may adopt reasonable rules, not inconsistent with those sections, for contractors and subcontractors engaged…”
Internatl. Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. Cty. Elec., L.L.C., 2009 Ohio 2433 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 3× “16(A) does not require an interested party to file a complaint on the Bureau's pre-printed form because R.C. 4115.12 allows the Director of Commerce to adopt reasonable rules to administer R.”
J.A. Croson Co. v. J.A. Guy, Inc., 1998 Ohio 621 (Ohio 1998). “Guy from its employees’ wages pursuant to its collective bargaining agreement with Local 189 is prohibited as a special assessment under the regulation.”
Vaughn Indus., LLC v. Lake Erie Elec., Inc., 2011 Ohio 1146 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). “” {¶37} R.C. 4115.12 provides that “[i]n order to facilitate the administration of sections 4115.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.