No person shall be permitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law, or to commence, conduct, or defend any action or proceeding in which the person is not a party concerned, either by using or subscribing the person's own name, or the name of another person, unless the person has been admitted to the bar by order of the supreme court in compliance with its prescribed and published rules. Except as provided in section 4705.09 of the Revised Code or in rules adopted by the supreme court, admission to the bar shall entitle the person to practice before any court or administrative tribunal without further qualification or license.
No sheriff shall practice as an attorney at law in any court of this state, and no clerk of the supreme court or court of common pleas, or the deputy of either, shall practice in the particular court of which that person is clerk or deputy.
No coroner in a county with a population of one hundred seventy-five thousand one or more who elects not to engage in the private practice of medicine pursuant to section 325.15 of the Revised Code shall practice as an attorney at law during the period in which the coroner may not engage in the private practice of medicine.
No judge of any court of record in this state shall engage in the practice of law during the judge's term of office, either by appearing in court, by acting as advisory or consulting counsel for attorneys or others, by accepting employment or acting as an attorney, solicitor, collector, or legal advisor for any bank, corporation, or loan or trust company, or by otherwise engaging in the practice of law in this state, in or out of the courts, except as provided in section 1901.11 of the Revised Code.
A judge may complete any business undertaken by the judge in the United States district court, the United States circuit court of appeals, or the supreme court of the United States prior to the judge's election as judge.
NASCAR Holdings, Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion), 2017 Ohio 9118 (Ohio 2017). · cites it 10ד{¶ 13} The BTA distinguished this case from Jemo because, in its opinion, “a non-Ohio attorney engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by preparing and filing a notice of appeal with this board.” BTA No. 2015-263 at 2.”
Leis v. Flynt, 439 U.S. 438 (1979). · cites it 2ד01 (1977), which provides in pertinent part: "No person shall be permitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law, or to commence, conduct, or defend any action or proceeding in which he is not a party concerned, either by using or subscribing his own name, or the name…”
State ex rel. Army of the Twelve Monkeys v. Warren Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Slip Opinion), 2019 Ohio 901 (Ohio 2019). · cites it 3ד{¶ 5} R.C. 4705.01 provides: No person shall be permitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law, or to commence, conduct, or defend any action or proceeding in which *347 the person is not a party concerned, either by using or subscribing the person's own name, or the…”
Moore v. Mount Carmel Health Sys., 2018 Ohio 2831 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 6ד{¶ 100} With respect to the unauthorized practice of law, R.C. 4705.01 provides that: No person shall be permitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law, or to commence, conduct, or defend any action or proceeding in which the person is not a party concerned, either by…”
Cannabis for Cures, L.L.C. v. State of Ohio Bd. of Pharm., 2018 Ohio 3193 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 4ד{¶ 9} R.C. 4705.01 pertinently states: No person shall be permitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law, or to commence, conduct, or defend any action or proceeding in which the person is not a party concerned, either by using or subscribing the person’s own name, or…”
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Pearlman, 106 Ohio St. 3d 136 (Ohio 2005). · cites it 2דR.C. 4705.01 states: {¶ 22} “No person shall be permitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law, or to commence, conduct, or defend any action or proceeding in which the person is not a party concerned, either by using or subscribing the person’s own name, or the name…”
In re Guardianship of Bakhtiar, 2018 Ohio 1764 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 3דAccordingly, the probate court determined that Saghafi had violated R.C. 4705.01 and struck his motions to remove Simonoff as guardian of the estate, requesting ex parte and emergency relief and motion for temporary restraining order, and brief in opposition to amended motion to…”
McLemore v. Clinton Cty. Sheiff's Off., 2023 Ohio 1604 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 4דThe court further explained that "[w]hen a person not admitted to the bar attempts to represent another in court on the basis of a power of attorney assigning pro se rights," that person violates R.C. 4705.01. (Emphasis sic.) Coleman at 158 .”
Baon v. Fairview Hosp., 2019 Ohio 3371 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 9דFairview Hospital, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and Doctors Straub, Alaedeen, Nagrant, and Hazzi filed a joint motion to dismiss, arguing that Darrell’s pro se complaint constituted an unauthorized practice of law under R.C. 4705.01 and that the action was a nullity and…”
In Re ICLNDS Notes Acquisition, LLC, 259 B.R. 289 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2001). · cites it 2דBruno engaged in the unauthorized practice of law when he prepared and filed the petition and schedules.”
Palmer v. Westmeyer, 549 N.E.2d 1202 (Ohio Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2דInitially, we must note that Deanbern Investment Corporation (“Deanbern”) did not file a valid appellate brief. On May 24, 1988, Deanbern filed a pro se brief, signed by David D.”
State v. Donkers, 867 N.E.2d 903 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). “For the court to allow such representation would have been to permit the unauthorized practice of law in violation of R.C. 4705.01. See, also, Gov.Bar R. IV. Instead, the court allowed appellant to dismiss her appointed attorney and afforded appellant her right to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.