As used in this section, "cost-of-living adjustment" means the cost-of-living adjustment made by the United States commissioner of social security under 42 U.S.C. 415(i) for benefits provided under Title II of the "Social Security Act of 1935."
The department of job and family services shall make all cash assistance payments for Ohio works first from funds appropriated for the Ohio works first program. The amount of a cash assistance payment the department is to make to an assistance group shall be determined in accordance with rules adopted under section 5107.05 of the Revised Code and shall not exceed the payment standard. The department shall increase the payment standard on January 1, 2009, and the first day of each January thereafter by the cost-of-living adjustment made in the immediately preceding December.
A county department of job and family services may use county funds to increase the amount of cash assistance an assistance group receives. An increase in the amount of cash assistance that results from such a use of county funds shall not be included as countable income, gross earned income, or gross unearned income of the assistance group.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1988–2000 · leading case: Brightwell v. Easter, 638 N.E.2d 1067 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
Brightwell v. Easter, 638 N.E.2d 1067 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 14דPlaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals the judgment of the Juvenile Division of the Summit County Common Pleas Court that it was not entitled to compensation for all public assistance furnished as support of the defendants-appellees’ minor children pursuant to R.C.…”
State Ex Rel. Donovan v. Zajac, 708 N.E.2d 254 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 3ד4 However, we agree with the Ninth District Court of Appeals in the following conclusion: “ * * * A father’s liability to reimburse the state for aid given to his child is mandatory under R.C. 5107.04. * * * It would be a waste of judicial resources to require two actions, one…”
Gilpen v. Just., 619 N.E.2d 94 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 8דIn conjunction with the paternity proceeding, the department sought repayment of those funds from appellee pursuant to R.C. 5107.04. A hearing was conducted on December 17, 1991.”
Crittendon v. Crittendon, 612 N.E.2d 759 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 3דIn contrast, R.C. 5107.04(C) provides that: “The county department of human services shall take action to recover erroneous payments, which may include instituting a civil action.”
Vance v. Banks, 640 N.E.2d 1214 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 3דSince the parent remains responsible for the child, all ADC payments made on behalf of the child should be recouped from the absent parent by the state as mandated by R.C. 5107.04. See State ex rel. Morgan Cty.”
State Ex Rel. Morgan Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Roddy, 579 N.E.2d 538 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 7דAccordingly, we sustain the second and third assignments, vacate the judgment below as it relates to the total amount of AFDC payments, and remand this cause to the court with instructions to make appropriate findings as to the amount of AFDC-related Medicaid arrearages and for…”
Montgomery v. John Doe 26, 750 N.E.2d 1149 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). “” Plaintiff next contends that subjecting plaintiff to the statute of limitations reaches an absurd result.”
Starr v. Starr, 671 N.E.2d 1097 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996). “In this case, CSEA proceeded as if a default judgment of divorce had been granted against it because it failed to receive notice sufficient to allow it to intervene.”
State Ex Rel. Gillion v. Reese, 646 N.E.2d 852 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 3ד*320 R.C. 5107.04(C) states that: “The county department of human services shall take action to recover erroneous payments, which may include instituting a civil action.”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. Bond, 635 N.E.2d 58 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2ד” R.C. 5107.04 sets forth statutory authority pursuant to which the department of human services may recover public assistance payments from an individual responsible for supporting the recipient of those funds.”
Cuyahoga Support Enf't Agency v. Coots, 651 N.E.2d 36 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994). “R.C. 5107.04(C) states as follows: “The county department of human services shall take action to recover erroneous payments, which may include instituting a civil action.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 5107.04(C) — 8 cases
State Ex Rel. Donovan v. Zajac, 708 N.E.2d 254 (Ohio Ct. App. 1998). “4 However, we agree with the Ninth District Court of Appeals in the following conclusion: “ * * * A father’s liability to reimburse the state for aid given to his child is mandatory under R.C. 5107.04. * * * It would be a waste of judicial resources to require two actions, one…”
Crittendon v. Crittendon, 612 N.E.2d 759 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992). “In contrast, R.C. 5107.04(C) provides that: “The county department of human services shall take action to recover erroneous payments, which may include instituting a civil action.”
Gilpen v. Just., 619 N.E.2d 94 (Ohio Ct. App. 1993). “In conjunction with the paternity proceeding, the department sought repayment of those funds from appellee pursuant to R.C. 5107.04. A hearing was conducted on December 17, 1991.”
Brightwell v. Easter, 638 N.E.2d 1067 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994). “Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals the judgment of the Juvenile Division of the Summit County Common Pleas Court that it was not entitled to compensation for all public assistance furnished as support of the defendants-appellees’ minor children pursuant to R.C.…”
Vance v. Banks, 640 N.E.2d 1214 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994). “Since the parent remains responsible for the child, all ADC payments made on behalf of the child should be recouped from the absent parent by the state as mandated by R.C. 5107.04. See State ex rel. Morgan Cty.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.