Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 523.01 (2026)

Merger to create new township

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The territory of one or more townships may be merged with that of a contiguous township to create a new township, in the manner provided under this chapter. The new township shall have all of, and only, the rights, powers, and responsibilities afforded by law to townships.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1994–1999 · leading case: State v. Endicott, 651 N.E.2d 1024 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Endicott, 651 N.E.2d 1024 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “4 Ohio Jury Instructions (1993) 348, Section 523.01(3). The record shows that the jury was never instructed on the essential elements of the principal offense in this case, aggravated drug trafficking.”
State v. Smith, Unpublished Decision (3-15-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “2d 1024 , 1027 (citing 4 Ohio Jury Instructions (1993) 348, Section 523.01(3)). Failure to instruct the jury on the underlying offenses of the conspiracy charge may constitute plain error.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 523.01(3) — 2 cases
State v. Endicott, 651 N.E.2d 1024 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994). “4 Ohio Jury Instructions (1993) 348, Section 523.01(3). The record shows that the jury was never instructed on the essential elements of the principal offense in this case, aggravated drug trafficking.”
State v. Smith, Unpublished Decision (3-15-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999). “2d 1024 , 1027 (citing 4 Ohio Jury Instructions (1993) 348, Section 523.01(3)). Failure to instruct the jury on the underlying offenses of the conspiracy charge may constitute plain error.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.