Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 10A, § 2-5-101 (2026)
Repealed by Laws 2018, c. 155, § 10, eff. Nov. 1,
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
2018.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2016–2018 · leading case: State of Iowa v. Noah Riley Crooks, 911 N.W.2d 153 (Iowa 2018).
State of Iowa v. Noah Riley Crooks, 911 N.W.2d 153 (Iowa 2018). “) (age thirteen or older for transfer for felonies); Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 10A, § 2-5-101 (West, Westlaw through ch.”
Mcneely v. State, 2018 OK CR 18 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). “Because a district court order regarding Stand Your Ground immunity is dispositive, an intermediate appeal is appropriate.”
State v. Dist. Court of Mayes Cnty., 2016 OK CR 19 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016). “McNulty's reference to 10A O.S.Supp.2009, § 2-5-101 is not applicable to this case as it applies only to crimes committed before January 1, 1998.”
State v. Dist. Court of Mayes Cnty., 2016 OK CR 19 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016). “2 10A O.S.2011, § 2-5-206 lists the offenses for which a 17-year-old may be charged as a Youthful Offender, and does not include the crime of conspiracy.”
Mcneely v. State, 2018 OK CR 18 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). “Because a district court order regarding Stand Your Ground immunity is dispositive, an intermediate appeal is appropriate.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10A, § 2-5-101(G) — 2 cases
Mcneely v. State, 2018 OK CR 18 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). “Because a district court order regarding Stand Your Ground immunity is dispositive, an intermediate appeal is appropriate.”
Mcneely v. State, 2018 OK CR 18 (Okla. Crim. App. 2018). “Because a district court order regarding Stand Your Ground immunity is dispositive, an intermediate appeal is appropriate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.