Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2013 (2026)

Counterclaim and cross-claim

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

COUNTERCLAIM AND CROSS-CLAIM A. COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIMS. A pleading shall state as a counterclaim any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against any opposing party, if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party's claim and does not require for its adjudication the presence of third parties of whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction. But the pleader need not state the claim if: 1. At the time the action was commenced the claim was the subject of another pending action; or 2. The opposing party brought suit upon his claim by attachment or other process by which the court did not acquire jurisdiction to render a personal judgment on that claim, and the pleader is not stating any counterclaim pursuant to this section. B. PERMISSIVE COUNTERCLAIMS; CONTINGENT COUNTERCLAIMS. 1. A pleading may state as a counterclaim any claim against an opposing party not arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party's claim. 2. A pleading may state as a counterclaim against an opposing party a contingent claim that the opposing party may be liable to the counterclaimant for all or part of a claim asserted in the action against the counterclaimant.

C. COUNTERCLAIM EXCEEDING OPPOSING CLAIMS; STATUTES OF LIMITATION. A counterclaim may or may not diminish or defeat the recovery sought by the opposing party. It may claim relief exceeding in amount or different in kind from that sought in the pleading of the opposing party. Where a counterclaim and the claim of the opposing party arise out of the same transaction or occurrence, the counterclaim shall not be barred by a statute of limitation notwithstanding that it was barred at the time the petition was filed, and the counterclaimant shall not be precluded from recovering an affirmative judgment. Where a counterclaim and the claim of the opposing party: 1. Do not arise out of the same transaction or occurrence; 2. Both claims are for money judgments; 3. Both claims had accrued before either was barred by a statute of limitation; and 4. The counterclaim is barred by a statute of limitation at the time that it is asserted, whether in an answer or an amended answer, the counterclaim may be asserted only to reduce the opposing party's claim. Where a counterclaim was barred by a statute of limitation before the claim of the opposing party arose, the barred counterclaim cannot be used for any purpose. D. COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST ASSIGNED CLAIMS. A party, other than a holder in due course, who acquires a claim by assignment or otherwise, takes the claim subject to any defenses or counterclaims that could have been asserted against the person from whom he acquired the claim, but the recovery on a counterclaim may be asserted only to reduce the recovery of the opposing party. E. CLAIM MATURING OR ACQUIRED AFTER PLEADING. A claim which either matured or was acquired by the pleader after serving his pleading may, with the permission of the court, be presented as a counterclaim or a cross-claim by supplemental pleading. F. OMITTED COUNTERCLAIM. When a pleader fails to set up an omitted counterclaim by amendment within twenty (20) days after service as authorized by subsection A of Section 2015 of this title, he may with leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party set up the counterclaim by amendment where the failure to assert it was due to oversight, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or where justice requires. G. CROSS-CLAIMS. A pleading may state as a cross-claim any claim by one party against any party who is not an opposing party arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter either of the original action or of a claim therein or relating to any property that is the subject matter of the original action. A cross-claim may assert a claim that the party against whom it is asserted is or may be liable to the cross-claimant for

all or part of a claim asserted in the action against the cross- claimant. H. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES. Persons other than those made parties to the original action may be made parties to a counterclaim or cross-claim in accordance with the provisions of Sections 2019 and 2020 of this title. I. SEPARATE TRIALS; SEPARATE JUDGMENTS. A court may order separate trials of a counterclaim or a cross-claim. A counterclaim or a cross-claim may proceed to trial and judgment thereon may be rendered even if the claim of the opposing party has been dismissed or otherwise disposed of. Added by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 13, eff. Nov. 1, 1984. Amended by Laws 1986, c. 227, § 6, eff. Nov. 1, 1986; Laws 1988, c. 181, § 2, eff. Nov. 1, 1988.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1989–2026 · leading case: United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Admin. v. Reed, 921 P.2d 338 (Okla. 1996).
United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Admin. v. Reed, 921 P.2d 338 (Okla. 1996). · cites it 16× “Hobbs relies on 12 O.S.1991 § 2013 [13] which allows counterclaims arising from the claim of the opposing party to be asserted although the limitations period has expired when the petition is filed.”
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Moss, 831 P.2d 613 (Okla. 1991). · cites it 16× “FDIC also urged that the primary action filed involved FDIC as liquidating agent for Newcastle, rather than FDIC in its corporate capacity (or capacity as liquidating agent for Dill,) [1] and thus the counterclaim was not proper under the Oklahoma Pleading Code, 12 O.S.Supp.…”
Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co. v. Dist. Court, Fifteenth Jud. Dist., 784 P.2d 61 (Okla. 1989). · cites it 7× “9 II A CLAIM FOR CONTRIBUTION IS NOT A COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM The terms of 12 O.S.Supp.1988 § 2013 10 make compulsory “any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against the opposing party, if it arises out of the [same transaction or occurrence].”
McDaneld v. Lynn Hickey Dodge, Inc., 1999 OK 30 (Okla. 1999). · cites it 5× “The Committee Comments to 12 O.S.1991 § 2013 recognize this general rule: "If a pleader fails to assert a compulsory counterclaim he cannot use it as the basis of an independent suit.”
Robinson v. Texhoma Limestone, Inc., 2004 OK 50 (Okla. 2004). · cites it 5× “Texho-ma and Merritt filed a motion to dismiss, contending that Merwin Robinson’s claim *675 was barred by 12 O.S.2001, § 2013(A) because he failed to assert it as a compulsory counterclaim when he filed his answer to the third party petition in the Eddie Robinson wrongful death…”
Gibson v. Par., 360 F. App'x 974 (10th Cir. 2010). · cites it 13× “Gibson argues that Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2013 (C), which states that a “counterclaim shall not be barred by a statute of limitation notwithstanding that it was barred at the time the petition was filed,” makes her claim timely.”
Roach v. Atlas Life Ins. Co., 769 P.2d 158 (Okla. 1989). · cites it 2× “1 and its successor 12 O.S.Supp. 1984 § 2013(G) provide a party to an action "may" assert a cross-claim.”
Fox v. Sec. Nat'l, 112 F.3d 453 (10th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2× “” Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2013 (A). “Failure to plead a compulsory counterclaim prevents a party from bringing a later independent action on that claim.”
Valley View Angus Ranch, Inc. v. Duke Energy Field Servs., Inc., 497 F.3d 1096 (10th Cir. 2007). “Under Oklahoma’s statute, a pleading must “state as a counterclaim any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against any opposing party, if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim and does…”
Greenberg v. Wolfberg, 890 P.2d 895 (Okla. 1995). “See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 674, comment a, which states: *902 "Since the term 'civil proceedings' includes a counterclaim, one who flies a counterclaim to a cause of action initiates a civil proceeding.”
Murray v. Mansheim, 2010 SD 18 (S.D. 2010). · cites it 2× “"); Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 12, § 2013(C) (specifying when counterclaims are barred by statutes of limitation and the type of relief allowed); Tenn.”
C & L Enter. Inc. v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Tribe of Oklahoma, 2002 OK 99 (Okla. 2002). · cites it 2× “" The pertinent provisions of § 2013(A) are: A. COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIMS. A pleading shall state as a counterclaim any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against any opposing party, if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2013(A) — 11 cases
Robinson v. Texhoma Limestone, Inc., 2004 OK 50 (Okla. 2004). “Texho-ma and Merritt filed a motion to dismiss, contending that Merwin Robinson’s claim *675 was barred by 12 O.S.2001, § 2013(A) because he failed to assert it as a compulsory counterclaim when he filed his answer to the third party petition in the Eddie Robinson wrongful death…”
McDaneld v. Lynn Hickey Dodge, Inc., 1999 OK 30 (Okla. 1999). “The Committee Comments to 12 O.S.1991 § 2013 recognize this general rule: "If a pleader fails to assert a compulsory counterclaim he cannot use it as the basis of an independent suit.”
Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co. v. Dist. Court, Fifteenth Jud. Dist., 784 P.2d 61 (Okla. 1989). “9 II A CLAIM FOR CONTRIBUTION IS NOT A COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM The terms of 12 O.S.Supp.1988 § 2013 10 make compulsory “any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against the opposing party, if it arises out of the [same transaction or occurrence].”
Bankers Trust Co. v. Brown, 2005 OK CIV APP 1 (Okla. Civ. App. 2004).
Am. Biomedical Grp., Inc. v. Norman Reg'l Hosp. Auth., 855 P.2d 1074 (Okla. Civ. App. 1993).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2013(B) — 3 cases
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Moss, 831 P.2d 613 (Okla. 1991). “FDIC also urged that the primary action filed involved FDIC as liquidating agent for Newcastle, rather than FDIC in its corporate capacity (or capacity as liquidating agent for Dill,) [1] and thus the counterclaim was not proper under the Oklahoma Pleading Code, 12 O.S.Supp.…”
Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co. v. Dist. Court, Fifteenth Jud. Dist., 784 P.2d 61 (Okla. 1989). “9 II A CLAIM FOR CONTRIBUTION IS NOT A COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM The terms of 12 O.S.Supp.1988 § 2013 10 make compulsory “any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against the opposing party, if it arises out of the [same transaction or occurrence].”
Fowler Equip. Co. v. Harry Houston Oil Co., 945 P.2d 513 (Okla. Civ. App. 1997).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2013(C) — 3 cases
United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Admin. v. Reed, 921 P.2d 338 (Okla. 1996). “Hobbs relies on 12 O.S.1991 § 2013 [13] which allows counterclaims arising from the claim of the opposing party to be asserted although the limitations period has expired when the petition is filed.”
Murray v. Mansheim, 2010 SD 18 (S.D. 2010). “"); Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 12, § 2013(C) (specifying when counterclaims are barred by statutes of limitation and the type of relief allowed); Tenn.”
Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Briscoe, 911 P.2d 311 (Okla. Civ. App. 1996).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2013(G) — 2 cases
Roach v. Atlas Life Ins. Co., 769 P.2d 158 (Okla. 1989). “1 and its successor 12 O.S.Supp. 1984 § 2013(G) provide a party to an action "may" assert a cross-claim.”
Farm Credit Bank of Wichita v. Trent, 1997 OK 70 (Okla. 1997).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2013(H) — 1 case
Turner v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 805 P.2d 130 (Okla. Civ. App. 1991).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.