Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2102 (2026)

Legislative purpose

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This Code shall be construed to secure fairness in administration, elimination of unjustifiable expense and delay and promotion of growth and development of the law of evidence to the end that the truth may be ascertained and proceedings justly determined. Added by Laws 1978, c. 285, § 102, eff. Oct. 1, 1978.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1984–2000 · leading case: Omalza v. State, 911 P.2d 286 (Okla. Crim. App. 1995).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Omalza v. State, 911 P.2d 286 (Okla. Crim. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “12 O.S.Supp. 1978, § 2103. In enacting the Code the Legislature made several changes to existing law.”

Dodd v. State, 2000 OK CR 2 (Okla. Crim. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “[6] 12 O.S.1991, § 2102. All rules of evidence in judicial proceedings are designed to ensure that evidence is reliable and probative.”

Callison v. Callison, 687 P.2d 106 (Okla. 1984). “See 12 O.S.1981 § 2102. . Little v. Streater, note 12, supra.”

Est. of Estes v. Kramer, 1999 OK 59 (Okla. 1999). “” Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2102 (1991). The transcript of the healing will be considered as evidence for the purpose of examining the orders in both the probate and the civil case.”

Three \M\" Investments, 827 P.2d 1324 (1992). “1991 § 2102 provide: "This Code shall be construed to secure fairness in administration, elimination of unjustifiable expense and delay and promotion of growth and development of the law of evidence to the end that the truth may be ascertained and proceedings justly determined.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.