Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 978.1 (2026)
Recovery of costs for review of certain interlocutory
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
orders on appeal or on certiorari. When an interlocutory order of a district court is reviewed on appeal or on certiorari and the interlocutory order is reversed, the prevailing party shall recover his costs, exclusive of attorney fees, including the cost deposit and the costs of preparing the record on appeal or on certiorari, regardless of the ultimate disposition of the action; and when the interlocutory order is reversed in part and affirmed in part, the costs shall be equally divided between the parties. Added by Laws 1980, c. 14, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2020–2021 · leading case: Thacker v. Walton, 491 P.3d 756 (Okla. Civ. App. 2020).
Thacker v. Walton, 491 P.3d 756 (Okla. Civ. App. 2020). “That scenario is squarely addressed by 12 O.S. § 978.1, which makes clear "costs shall be equally divided between the parties" when an interlocutory order is reversed in part and affirmed in part.”
Thacker v. Walton, 2021 OK CIV APP 5 (Okla. Civ. App. 2021). “That scenario is squarely addressed by 12 O.S. § 978.1, which makes clear "costs shall be equally divided between the parties" when an interlocutory order is reversed in part and affirmed in part.”
Thacker v. Walton, 491 P.3d 756 (Okla. Civ. App. 2021). “That scenario is squarely addressed by 12 O.S. § 978.1, which makes clear "costs shall be equally divided between the parties" when an interlocutory order is reversed in part and affirmed in part.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.