Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-307 (2026)
Repealed by Laws 2000, c. 371, § 185, eff. July 1,
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
2001.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1976–1998 · leading case: The First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City, Plaintiff v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 626 F.2d 764 (1st Cir. 1980).
The First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City, Plaintiff v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 626 F.2d 764 (1st Cir. 1980). “Okla. Stat.Ann. tit. 12A, § 9-307 (West 1963).”
Idabel Nat'l Bank, Idabel v. Tucker, 544 P.2d 1287 (Okla. Civ. App. 1976). “” Tucker contends that under 12A O.S. 1971, § 9-307 he is a buyer in the ordinary course of business and thus takes free of a security interest.”
Liberty Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City v. Garcia, 686 P.2d 303 (Okla. Civ. App. 1984). “old that under Oklahoma law when the Oklahoma Tax Commission or its agent fails either by way of negligence or for other reasons to note a security interest on the certificate of title, but the security interest was properly perfected by delivery of the required items to the…”
O'DELL v. Kunkel's, Inc., 581 P.2d 878 (Okla. 1978). “” 12A O.S.1971, § 9-307. The fact that the O’Dells necessarily take free from any security interest Kunkel’s may have attempted to reserve under the U.”
Mitchell Coach Mfg. Co. v. Stephens, 19 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (N.D. Okla. 1998). “307(a); see also 12A O.S. § 9-307(1). “Buyer in the ordinary course of business” is defined in § 1.”
Riverside Nat'l Bank v. Law, 564 P.2d 240 (Okla. 1977). “12A O.S.1971, § 9-307. We conclude that Appellee qualifies as a purchaser in ordinary course of business with regard to his purchase of the subject automobile from Wyatt, who at the time of sale engaged in the business of buying and selling automobiles through Wizard Auto…”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-307(1) — 2 cases
Liberty Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City v. Garcia, 686 P.2d 303 (Okla. Civ. App. 1984). “old that under Oklahoma law when the Oklahoma Tax Commission or its agent fails either by way of negligence or for other reasons to note a security interest on the certificate of title, but the security interest was properly perfected by delivery of the required items to the…”
Mitchell Coach Mfg. Co. v. Stephens, 19 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (N.D. Okla. 1998). “307(a); see also 12A O.S. § 9-307(1). “Buyer in the ordinary course of business” is defined in § 1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.