Okla. Stat. » Title 12A — UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-402 (2026)

Repealed by Laws 2000, c. 371, § 185, eff. July 1,

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

2001.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29 cases, 1970–2004 · leading case: First Nat'l Bank of Atoka v. Calvin Pickle Co., 516 P.2d 265 (Okla. 1973).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
First Nat'l Bank of Atoka v. Calvin Pickle Co., 516 P.2d 265 (Okla. 1973). · cites it 9× “The Plaintiff argues that only a simple notice containing the information set out in 12A O.S.1971 § 9-402 need be filed, citing the Oklahoma Code Comment under 12A O.”
Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In Re Otasco, Inc.), 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990). · cites it 6× “Those opinions do not mention the ambiguous language of the Motor Vehicle Act itself, nor take account of either the express provisions of 12A O.”
Citizens Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Star Auto. Warehouse, Inc. (In Re Thriftway Auto Supply, Inc.), 159 B.R. 948 (W.D. Okla. 1993). · cites it 7× “The issues presented on appeal are whether the financial statement filed by Star was sufficient under Oklahoma’s version of the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”), Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-402, to perfect its credit interest, despite the fact that it was filed under the debtor’s…”
In Re Hembree, 635 P.2d 601 (Okla. 1981). · cites it 3× “[2] The debtor contends that *603 because 12A O.S. 1971 § 9-402(1) specifically requires that a financing statement be signed by the debtor and the secured party, so should the lien entry form; and that the signature is necessary for authentication.”
Sw. State Bank v. Ellis (In Re Ellis), 310 B.R. 762 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 2004). · cites it 2× “The issue was whether the description of the collateral as “All crops for the 1967 *767 Season” in a financing statement was a sufficient description under 12A O.S. § 9-402. 7 The Oklahoma Supreme Court concluded it was not sufficient “since .”
Georgia-Pac. Corp. v. Lumber Prods. Co., 590 P.2d 661 (Okla. 1979). “) 12A O.S.1971, § 9-402(1) provides that for a financing statement to be sufficient, it must contain: “ * * * a statement indicating the types, or describing the items, of collateral.”
Am. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Nat'l Cash Register Co., 473 P.2d 234 (Okla. 1970). · cites it 2× “” Title 12A O.S.1961, § 9-402(1) provides that a financing statement is sufficient if it is signed by the debtor and the secured party, gives an address of the secured party “from which information concerning the security interest may be obtained,” gives a mailing address of the…”
Peoples Nat'l Bank v. Uhlenhake, 712 P.2d 75 (Okla. Civ. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “To perfect a security interest in collateral, a creditor such as Boecking must file a financing statement which complies with the requirements of 12A O.S.1981 § 9-402. The purpose of the filing system is “to give notice to creditors and other interested parties that a security…”
First Mustang State Bank v. Garland Bloodworth, Inc., 825 P.2d 254 (Okla. 1992). “The Banks say that it should have been perfected in accordance with the Uniform Commercial Code, 12A O.S.1981 § 9-402, since Attorney’s interest was in the proceeds of the land sale contract, not in the actual realty.”
Paul Arpin Van Lines, Inc. v. Babb (In Re Hughen), 38 B.R. 13 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1983). · cites it 2× “the “minor errors which are not seriously misleading” language of 12A O.S.1981 § 9-402(8) a secured party under § 23.”
Consol. Equip. Sales, Inc. v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Guthrie, 627 P.2d 432 (Okla. 1981). “12A O.S.1971 § 9-402(1). 6 . 12A O.S.1971 § 9-504(3).”
In Re Cook, 637 P.2d 588 (Okla. 1981). “12A O.S. 1971 § 9-402(5) provides that a filing substantially complies if it contains "minor errors" which are not "seriously misleading.”
Show all 29 citing cases →
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-402(1) — 9 cases
First Nat'l Bank of Atoka v. Calvin Pickle Co., 516 P.2d 265 (Okla. 1973). “The Plaintiff argues that only a simple notice containing the information set out in 12A O.S.1971 § 9-402 need be filed, citing the Oklahoma Code Comment under 12A O.”
Georgia-Pac. Corp. v. Lumber Prods. Co., 590 P.2d 661 (Okla. 1979). “) 12A O.S.1971, § 9-402(1) provides that for a financing statement to be sufficient, it must contain: “ * * * a statement indicating the types, or describing the items, of collateral.”
In Re Hembree, 635 P.2d 601 (Okla. 1981). “[2] The debtor contends that *603 because 12A O.S. 1971 § 9-402(1) specifically requires that a financing statement be signed by the debtor and the secured party, so should the lien entry form; and that the signature is necessary for authentication.”
Am. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Nat'l Cash Register Co., 473 P.2d 234 (Okla. 1970). “” Title 12A O.S.1961, § 9-402(1) provides that a financing statement is sufficient if it is signed by the debtor and the secured party, gives an address of the secured party “from which information concerning the security interest may be obtained,” gives a mailing address of the…”
Consol. Equip. Sales, Inc. v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Guthrie, 627 P.2d 432 (Okla. 1981). “12A O.S.1971 § 9-402(1). 6 . 12A O.S.1971 § 9-504(3).”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-402(3) — 1 case
First Nat'l Bank of Atoka v. Calvin Pickle Co., 516 P.2d 265 (Okla. 1973). “The Plaintiff argues that only a simple notice containing the information set out in 12A O.S.1971 § 9-402 need be filed, citing the Oklahoma Code Comment under 12A O.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-402(5) — 9 cases
In Re Cook, 637 P.2d 588 (Okla. 1981). “12A O.S. 1971 § 9-402(5) provides that a filing substantially complies if it contains "minor errors" which are not "seriously misleading.”
In Re Hembree, 635 P.2d 601 (Okla. 1981). “[2] The debtor contends that *603 because 12A O.S. 1971 § 9-402(1) specifically requires that a financing statement be signed by the debtor and the secured party, so should the lien entry form; and that the signature is necessary for authentication.”
Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In Re Otasco, Inc.), 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990). “Those opinions do not mention the ambiguous language of the Motor Vehicle Act itself, nor take account of either the express provisions of 12A O.”
First Nat'l Bank of Atoka v. Calvin Pickle Co., 516 P.2d 265 (Okla. 1973). “The Plaintiff argues that only a simple notice containing the information set out in 12A O.S.1971 § 9-402 need be filed, citing the Oklahoma Code Comment under 12A O.”
Woodson v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 637 P.2d 588 (Okla. 1981).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-402(7) — 3 cases
LMS Holding Co. v. Core-Mark Mid-Continent, Inc., 50 F.3d 1520 (10th Cir. 1995).
Citizens Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Star Auto. Warehouse, Inc. (In Re Thriftway Auto Supply, Inc.), 159 B.R. 948 (W.D. Okla. 1993). “The issues presented on appeal are whether the financial statement filed by Star was sufficient under Oklahoma’s version of the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”), Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-402, to perfect its credit interest, despite the fact that it was filed under the debtor’s…”
Union Nat'l Bank of Chandler v. Bancfirst (Seminole), 871 P.2d 422 (Okla. 1993).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-402(8) — 8 cases
Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In Re Otasco, Inc.), 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990). “Those opinions do not mention the ambiguous language of the Motor Vehicle Act itself, nor take account of either the express provisions of 12A O.”
Paul Arpin Van Lines, Inc. v. Babb (In Re Hughen), 38 B.R. 13 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1983). “the “minor errors which are not seriously misleading” language of 12A O.S.1981 § 9-402(8) a secured party under § 23.”
Citizens Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Star Auto. Warehouse, Inc. (In Re Thriftway Auto Supply, Inc.), 159 B.R. 948 (W.D. Okla. 1993). “The issues presented on appeal are whether the financial statement filed by Star was sufficient under Oklahoma’s version of the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”), Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-402, to perfect its credit interest, despite the fact that it was filed under the debtor’s…”
Mather v. Northfield Freezing Sys., Inc. (In Re S. Star Foods, Inc.), 202 B.R. 784 (Bankr. E.D. Okla. 1996).
Manchester v. Green Tree Fin. Servicing Corp., 97 P.3d 639 (Okla. 2004).
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-402(l) — 1 case
Amarex, Inc. v. El Paso Nat. Gas Co., 772 P.2d 905 (Okla. 1987).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.