Okla. Stat. » Title 12A — UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-403 (2026)

Repealed by Laws 2000, c. 371, § 185, eff. July 1,

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

2001.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1979–2000 · leading case: North Texas Prod. Credit Ass'n v. McCurtain Cnty. Nat'l Bank, 222 F.3d 800 (10th Cir. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
North Texas Prod. Credit Ass'n v. McCurtain Cnty. Nat'l Bank, 222 F.3d 800 (10th Cir. 2000). · cites it 3× “The fact that the financing statement was missing from the record, alone, would not be sufficient to put NTPCA into a position of first priority.”
Sec. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Norman v. Dentsply Prof'l Plan, 617 P.2d 1340 (Okla. 1980). “2d 1341 [1978]; 12A O.S.1971 § 9-403(2). 6 . First State Bank in Talihina v.”
Smiley v. Wheeler, 602 P.2d 209 (Okla. 1979). “Under 12A O.S.1971 § 9-403(2) plaintiff’s financing statement was effective for only five years unless a continuation statement was filed prior to its lapse.”
In Re Edwards Equip. Co., 46 B.R. 689 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1985). “The statute upon which Edwards rests its argument is 12A O.S. 1981 § 9-403(3): “[a]ny such continuation statement must be signed by the secured party, identify the original statement by file number and state that the original statement is still effective.”
C.I.T. Fin. Servs. v. Premier Corp., 747 P.2d 934 (Okla. 1987). “’s lien, filed in February 1979, lapsed after five years under 12A O.S.1981 § 9-403(2), but because of our disposition of the first question we need not address the second.”
Fed. Fin. Co. v. Grady Cnty., 988 P.2d 908 (Okla. Civ. App. 1999). “” 12A O.S.1991 § 9-403(2) 3 . As we understand its argument, FFC contends § 9-403(2) is inapplicable here for two reasons: (1)the foreclosure sale at which County purchased the equipment was of no effect because Bank of New England was not joined as a party, and (2) County could…”
Cimarron Nursing Ctr. v. Armstrong (In Re Cimarron Nursing Ctr.), 143 B.R. 578 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1992). · cites it 3× “12A O.S. §§ 9-403(1) and 9-301(1). In this instance, no continuation statement was filed within the period.”
In Re La Selle's Bicycle World, 120 B.R. 579 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990). “The section states: “Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this article.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-403(1) — 3 cases
North Texas Prod. Credit Ass'n v. McCurtain Cnty. Nat'l Bank, 222 F.3d 800 (10th Cir. 2000). “The fact that the financing statement was missing from the record, alone, would not be sufficient to put NTPCA into a position of first priority.”
Cimarron Nursing Ctr. v. Armstrong (In Re Cimarron Nursing Ctr.), 143 B.R. 578 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1992). “12A O.S. §§ 9-403(1) and 9-301(1). In this instance, no continuation statement was filed within the period.”
In Re La Selle's Bicycle World, 120 B.R. 579 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990). “The section states: “Presentation for filing of a financing statement and tender of the filing fee or acceptance of the statement by the filing officer constitutes filing under this article.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-403(2) — 5 cases
Sec. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Norman v. Dentsply Prof'l Plan, 617 P.2d 1340 (Okla. 1980). “2d 1341 [1978]; 12A O.S.1971 § 9-403(2). 6 . First State Bank in Talihina v.”
Smiley v. Wheeler, 602 P.2d 209 (Okla. 1979). “Under 12A O.S.1971 § 9-403(2) plaintiff’s financing statement was effective for only five years unless a continuation statement was filed prior to its lapse.”
C.I.T. Fin. Servs. v. Premier Corp., 747 P.2d 934 (Okla. 1987). “’s lien, filed in February 1979, lapsed after five years under 12A O.S.1981 § 9-403(2), but because of our disposition of the first question we need not address the second.”
Fed. Fin. Co. v. Grady Cnty., 988 P.2d 908 (Okla. Civ. App. 1999). “” 12A O.S.1991 § 9-403(2) 3 . As we understand its argument, FFC contends § 9-403(2) is inapplicable here for two reasons: (1)the foreclosure sale at which County purchased the equipment was of no effect because Bank of New England was not joined as a party, and (2) County could…”
Cimarron Nursing Ctr. v. Armstrong (In Re Cimarron Nursing Ctr.), 143 B.R. 578 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1992). “12A O.S. §§ 9-403(1) and 9-301(1). In this instance, no continuation statement was filed within the period.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 9-403(3) — 2 cases
North Texas Prod. Credit Ass'n v. McCurtain Cnty. Nat'l Bank, 222 F.3d 800 (10th Cir. 2000). “The fact that the financing statement was missing from the record, alone, would not be sufficient to put NTPCA into a position of first priority.”
In Re Edwards Equip. Co., 46 B.R. 689 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 1985). “The statute upon which Edwards rests its argument is 12A O.S. 1981 § 9-403(3): “[a]ny such continuation statement must be signed by the secured party, identify the original statement by file number and state that the original statement is still effective.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.