Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 142A-9 (2026)

Disclosure of personal information of victim or witness

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

may be prohibited. The court, upon the request of a victim, witness, or the district attorney, may order that the residential address, telephone number, place of employment, or other personal information of the victim or witness shall not be disclosed in any law enforcement record or any court document, other than the transcript of a court proceeding, if it is determined by the court to be necessary to protect the victim, witness, or immediate family of the victim or witness from harassment or physical harm and if the court determines that the information is immaterial to the defense. Added by Laws 1992, c. 136, § 9, eff. July 1, 1992. Amended by Laws 1999, c. 417, § 3, emerg. eff. June 10, 1999; Laws 2006, c. 197, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 2006; Laws 2010, c. 135, § 15, eff. Nov. 1, 2010. Renumbered from § 984.2 of Title 22 by Laws 2010, c. 135, § 20, eff. Nov. 1, 2010.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2016–2016 · leading case: Revision of Portion of the Rules of the Court of Crim. Appeals, 2016 OK CR 20 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016).
Revision of Portion of the Rules of the Court of Crim. Appeals, 2016 OK CR 20 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 3× “21 O.S.2011, § 142A-9; (d) Any post-mortem photograph or video of the victim of a homicide or an exhibit containing such images; (e) Any document or exhibit, other than the transcript of a court proceeding or exhibit revealing prior conviction, which lists a witness’ date of…”
Revision of Portion of the Rules of the Court of Crim. Appeals, 2016 OK CR 20 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 6× “21 O.S.2011, § 142A-9; (d) Any post-mortem photograph or video of the victim of a homicide or an exhibit containing such images; (e) Any document or exhibit, other than the transcript of a court proceeding or exhibit revealing prior conviction, which lists a witness' date of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.