Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1437 (2026)

Possession of burglar's implements

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Every person who, under circumstances not amounting to a felony has in his possession any dangerous offensive weapon or instrument whatever, or any pick-lock, crow, key, bit, jack, jimmy, nippers, pick, betty or other implement of burglary, with intent to break and enter any building or part of any building, booth, tent, railroad car, vessel or other structure or erection and to commit any felony therein, is guilty of a misdemeanor. R.L.1910, § 2617.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1971–2006 · leading case: Jiminez v. State, 2006 OK CR 43 (Okla. Crim. App. 2006).
Jiminez v. State, 2006 OK CR 43 (Okla. Crim. App. 2006). “2001 , § 1435; Count 2, possession of burglar’s implements, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2003, § 1437; Count 3, possession of drug paraphernalia, in violation of 63 O.”
State v. Warner, 696 P.2d 1052 (Or. 1985). “…enacted in 1898; NY Penal Law § 140.35 (McKinney 1975), enacted in 1881; NC Gen Stat § 14-55 (1981), enacted in 1907; Okla Stat Ann tit 21, § 1437 (1983), enacted in 1890; RI Gen Laws § 11-8-7 (1981), enactedin 1896; SC Code Ann § 16-11-20 (1977), enacted in 1907; SD Codified…”
Lewis v. State, 493 P.2d 91 (Okla. Crim. App. 1971). “” The fourth and last proposition of Defendant’s brief asserts that Defendant Thomas’ prior 1961 conviction for Possession of Burglary Tools, in the State of Kansas, would have been a misdemeanor under the provisions of Title 21 O.S.1961, Section 1437, in this State and should…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.