Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 995.15 (2026)

Repealed by Laws 1992, c. 328, § 33, eff. Dec. 1, 1992,

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

and State Question No. 650, Legislative Referendum No. 294, at election held Nov. 3, 1992.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1991 · leading case: State ex rel. Moss v. New Day Tabernacle, 801 P.2d 742 (Okla. Civ. App. 1990).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State ex rel. Moss v. New Day Tabernacle, 801 P.2d 742 (Okla. Civ. App. 1990). “5, but also for imposition of criminal penalties under 21 O.S.Supp.1984 § 995.15. By necessary implication, we hold that proof of violation of bingo laws justifying revocation of the bingo license under § 995.”

United States v. Ed J. Hagen, Also Known as J. Ewald Martha Jo \Marjo\" Hagen & William C. Hagen, 951 F.2d 261 (1991). “Okla.Stat. tit. 21, § 995.15. It is clear that a misdemeanor is sufficiently penal to warrant liability under 18 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.