Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 42, § 19 (2026)

Holder of inferior lien - Redemption

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

One who has a lien, inferior to another upon the same property, has a right: 1. To redeem the property in the same manner as its owner might, from the superior lien; and, 2. To be subrogated to all the benefits of the superior lien when necessary for the protection of his interests, upon satisfying the claim secured thereby. R.L. 1910, § 3840.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 10 cases, 1949–2008 · leading case: First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. Nath, 839 P.2d 1336 (Okla. 1992).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. Nath, 839 P.2d 1336 (Okla. 1992). · cites it 2× “For the definition of redemption, see infra note 38; for the terms of 42 O.S.1981 § 19, which gives an inferior lien- *1341 holder the right to redeem the property from the superior lien, see infra note 43.”

Sooner Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Oklahoma Cent. Credit Union, 790 P.2d 526 (Okla. 1989). “The appellant contends that the trial court erred in permitting the Credit Union to exercise this right of redemption because the Credit Union had previously attempted to disclaim interest in the property. The basis of the appellant’s contention of error is without merit because…”

Robey v. Long Beach Mortg. Corp., 124 P.3d 221 (Okla. 2005). · cites it 3× “2001, §§ 764(A)(1), 2 766, 42 O.S.2001, § 19. 3 The court’s findings and conclusions included an award of an attorney’s fee to be set by proper application.”

In Re Harper, 516 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2008). “The credit union also argues that statutory subrogation pursuant, to Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 42, § 19 (2) [6] or equitable subrogation allow it to prevail.”

Sec. Nat'l Bank of Enid v. Bonnett, 623 P.2d 1061 (Okla. Civ. App. 1981). “Intervention was granted, and the Bank tendered payment of the mortgage pursuant to 42 O.S.1971, § 19 and requested that the trial court determine a reasonable attorney’s fee to be granted to the Kennedys.”

Ivey v. Henry's Diesel Serv., Inc., 418 P.2d 634 (Okla. 1966). “” 42 O.S.1961, § 19 — “One who has a lien, inferior to another upon the same property, has a right: 1.”

Malloy v. WilServ Credit Union, 516 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “…of the superior lien when necessary for the protection of his interests, upon satisfying the claim secured thereby. Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 42, § 19 .”

Bank One, Oklahoma, N.A. v. Tanner, 23 P.3d 977 (Okla. Civ. App. 2001). “114 Buyer next contends that Harris Trust cannot redeem the encumbered property because, though Harris Trust is an inferior lien holder, the sheriff's sale was done in order to satisfy the liens of Bank One and Harris Trust.”

State ex rel. Commissioners of Land Off. v. Mobley, 255 P.2d 945 (Okla. 1949). “The doctrine of subrogation is governed and controlled in its operation by principles of equity, rather than by strict legal rules, and one of the conditions of subrogation in all cases, in the absence of specific contract, is that the subrogee discharge the obligation of…”

Malloy v. WilServ Credit Union, 383 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “The credit union also argues that statutory subrogation pursuant to Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 42, § 19 (2) 6 or equitable subrogation allow it to prevail.”

— Okla. Stat. tit. 42, § 19(2) — 1 case

Malloy v. WilServ Credit Union, 516 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2008). “…of the superior lien when necessary for the protection of his interests, upon satisfying the claim secured thereby. Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 42, § 19 .”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.