Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-707b (2026)

Granting of staff privileges - Criteria

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The administrator in charge of or the governing board of each hospital licensed by the State Commissioner of Health shall adopt written criteria for use in determining which licensed medical doctors, doctors of osteopathy, doctors of podiatry, and health service psychologists shall be granted professional and/or medical staff privileges by the hospital. A licensed hospital shall not deny an application based solely on the applicant's license, as long as the applicant is licensed to practice: 1. Medicine by the State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision; 2. Osteopathy by the State Board of Osteopathy; 3. Podiatry by the State Board of Podiatry; or 4. As a health service psychologist by the Oklahoma State Board of Examiners of Psychologists. B. The accordance and delineation of medical staff membership or clinical privileges shall be determined on an individual basis commensurate with an applicant's education, training, experience and demonstrated clinical competence. C. When medical education training and specialty board certification are considerations in the credentialing and recredentialing of physicians, hospitals and health plans shall give equal recognition to those bodies recognized by the federal government for the training and certification of such physicians. Hospitals and health plans shall not discriminate, on the basis of education, against eligible physicians who have:

1. Graduated from medical schools and postdoctoral programs approved by either the American Osteopathic Association or the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; or 2. Been awarded board eligibility or board certification by specialty boards recognized by either the American Osteopathic Association or the American Board of Medical Specialties. Added by Laws 1977, c. 180, § 2. Amended by Laws 1979, c. 142, § 2; Laws 1995, c. 134, § 2, eff. Nov. 1, 1995; Laws 1995, c. 358, § 6, eff. Nov. 1, 1995; Laws 1999, c. 93, § 8, eff. Nov. 1, 1999; Laws 2002, c. 156, § 2, eff. Nov. 1, 2002. NOTE: Laws 1995, c. 107, § 1 repealed by Laws 1995, c. 358, § 13, eff. Nov. 1, 1995.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2017–2017 · leading case: Question Submitted by: The Honorable Mike Ritze, State Rep. Dist. 80, 2017 OK AG 13 (Okla. Att’y Gen. 2017).
Question Submitted by: The Honorable Mike Ritze, State Rep. Dist. 80, 2017 OK AG 13 (Okla. Att’y Gen. 2017). · cites it 8× “A hospital may refuse to grant hospital privileges to a physician based on the physician not holding a medical board certification, 63 O.S.2011, § 1-707b (B), but board certification also may not be the sole basis of according privileges.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-707b(A) — 1 case
Question Submitted by: The Honorable Mike Ritze, State Rep. Dist. 80, 2017 OK AG 13 (Okla. Att’y Gen. 2017). “A hospital may refuse to grant hospital privileges to a physician based on the physician not holding a medical board certification, 63 O.S.2011, § 1-707b (B), but board certification also may not be the sole basis of according privileges.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-707b(B) — 1 case
Question Submitted by: The Honorable Mike Ritze, State Rep. Dist. 80, 2017 OK AG 13 (Okla. Att’y Gen. 2017). “A hospital may refuse to grant hospital privileges to a physician based on the physician not holding a medical board certification, 63 O.S.2011, § 1-707b (B), but board certification also may not be the sole basis of according privileges.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.