Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1092.2 (2026)

Compliance with Federal Uniform Relocation Act -

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Compensation and reimbursement payments. A. When any department, agency or instrumentality of the state, or any county, municipality, or other political subdivision of the state, or any other public or private entity subject to the provisions of the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, Public Laws 91-646, and 100-17, Title IV, hereinafter referred to as the Federal Uniform Relocation Act, undertakes any project which results in the acquisition of real property or in any person being displaced from the home, business, or farm of such person, such department, agency or instrumentality of the state, county, municipality or other political subdivision of the state, or other public or private entity may provide relocation assistance, and make relocation payments to such displaced person and do such other acts and follow such procedures and practices as may be necessary to comply with the provisions of the Federal Uniform Relocation Act. B. Any payment made or to be made pursuant to the authority granted in this section shall be for compensating or reimbursing the displaced person or owner of real property in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Uniform Relocation Act and such payment shall not for any purpose be deemed or considered compensation for real property acquired or compensation for damages to remaining property. Added by Laws 1988, c. 315, § 4, emerg. eff. July 6, 1988.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2006–2006 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Dep't of Transp. v. Kelly, 2007 OK CIV APP 25 (Okla. Civ. App. 2006).
State Ex Rel. Dep't of Transp. v. Kelly, 2007 OK CIV APP 25 (Okla. Civ. App. 2006). “63 O.S. § 1092.2(b). (Emphasis supplied.) Because relocation housing payments are not recoverable in an eminent domain action, the trial court erred in directing the inclusion of RHPs as proper for consideration in awarding landowners just compensation.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1092.2(b) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Dep't of Transp. v. Kelly, 2007 OK CIV APP 25 (Okla. Civ. App. 2006). “63 O.S. § 1092.2(b). (Emphasis supplied.) Because relocation housing payments are not recoverable in an eminent domain action, the trial court erred in directing the inclusion of RHPs as proper for consideration in awarding landowners just compensation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.