State v. Stringham, 399 P.2d 1015 (Or. 1965). · Go Syfert
State v. Stringham, 399 P.2d 1015 (Or. 1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF OREGON
v.
STRINGHAM
Oregon Supreme Court.
Mar 10, 1965.
399 P.2d 1015
James P. Leahy, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant., Tom P. Price, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.
Connell, Denecke, Lusk, McAllister, Perry.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The state having confessed prejudicial error the judgment is reversed and remanded for a new trial.