Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 105.465 (2026)

Application of ORS 105.462 to 105.490, 696.301 and 696.870; disclosure statement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      105.465 Application of ORS 105.462 to 105.490, 696.301 and 696.870; disclosure statement. (1) The provisions of ORS 105.462 to 105.490, 696.301 and 696.870:

      (a) Apply to the real property described in subparagraphs (A) to (D) of this paragraph unless the buyer indicates to the seller, which indication shall be conclusive, that the buyer will use the real property for purposes other than a residence for the buyer or the buyer’s spouse, parent or child:

      (A) Real property consisting of or improved by one to four dwelling units;

      (B) A condominium unit as defined in ORS 100.005 and not subject to disclosure under ORS 100.705;

      (C) A timeshare property as defined in ORS 94.803 and not subject to disclosure under ORS 94.829; and

      (D) A manufactured dwelling, as defined in ORS 446.003, that is owned by the same person who owns the land upon which the manufactured dwelling is situated.

      (b) Do not apply to a leasehold in real property.

      (2) Except as provided in ORS 105.475 (4), a seller shall complete, sign and deliver a seller’s property disclosure statement as set forth in ORS 105.464 to each buyer who makes a written offer to purchase real property in this state. [1993 c.547 §1; 1997 c.816 §15; 1999 c.307 §24; 1999 c.677 §65; 2001 c.300 §74; 2003 c.328 §1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1994–2018 · leading case: Patterson v. Amundson, 119 P.3d 264 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Patterson v. Amundson, 119 P.3d 264 (Or. Ct. App. 2005). “” Plaintiffs’ attorney enclosed with the letter a separate written statement that said: “I, David Patterson, [plaintiff,] hereby rescind my agreement to purchase from you the property at 12500 SE Bluff Drive, Clackamas, Oregon because you have not delivered to me either the…”
Bishop v. Waters, 380 P.3d 1114 (Or. Ct. App. 2016). “” ORS 105.465(2) provides that the seller’s disclosure statement is to be given “to each buyer who makes a written offer to purchase real property in this state.”
Terway v. Real Est. Agency, 196 P.3d 1022 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). “Fleming completed a Seller’s Disclosure Disclaimer Exemption, certifying that the transaction was not subject to the requirements of ORS 105.465 to 105.490 (the Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement) because he had never occupied any part of the real property.”
Fox v. Real Est. Agency, 426 P.3d 179 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “See ORS 105.465 (requiring use of property disclosure statement); ORS 105.”
Cowan v. Nordyke, 222 P.3d 1093 (Or. Ct. App. 2009). “He notes that anyone selling a house is required to disclose such defects in the property disclosure statement required by ORS 105.465(2) and that buyers have remedies for fraud or breach of contract if the seller fails to disclose or misrepresents the defects.”
Cameron v. Harshbarger, 998 P.2d 221 (Or. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 7× “490 provides: “ORS 105.465 * * * shall not directly, indirectly or by implication limit or alter any preexisting common-law or statutory right or remedy including actions for fraud, negligence, or equitable relief.”
Atkinson v. Davis, 34 Va. Cir. 139 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 1994). “Oregon’s legislation provides for a disclosure statement ( Or. Rev. Stat. § 105.465 ) and charges real estate licensees with a duty to disclose, deviating from the Virginia language only in that a seller’s broker in Oregon does not have a corresponding duty to a buyer who is…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 105.465(2) — 3 cases
Bishop v. Waters, 380 P.3d 1114 (Or. Ct. App. 2016). “” ORS 105.465(2) provides that the seller’s disclosure statement is to be given “to each buyer who makes a written offer to purchase real property in this state.”
Cowan v. Nordyke, 222 P.3d 1093 (Or. Ct. App. 2009). “He notes that anyone selling a house is required to disclose such defects in the property disclosure statement required by ORS 105.465(2) and that buyers have remedies for fraud or breach of contract if the seller fails to disclose or misrepresents the defects.”
Cameron v. Harshbarger, 998 P.2d 221 (Or. Ct. App. 2000). “490 provides: “ORS 105.465 * * * shall not directly, indirectly or by implication limit or alter any preexisting common-law or statutory right or remedy including actions for fraud, negligence, or equitable relief.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.