110.518 Bases
for jurisdiction over nonresident; limitations. (1) In a proceeding to establish
or enforce a support order or to determine parentage of a child, a tribunal of
this state may exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident individual or
the individual’s guardian or conservator if:
(a) The
individual is personally served with notice within this state;
(b) The
individual submits to the jurisdiction of this state by consent in a record, by
entering a general appearance or by filing a responsive document having the
effect of waiving any contest to personal jurisdiction;
(c) The
individual resided with the child in this state;
(d) The
individual resided in this state and provided prenatal expenses or support for
the child;
(e) The child
resides in this state as a result of the acts or directives of the individual;
(f) The
individual engaged in sexual intercourse in this state and the child may have
been conceived by that act of intercourse; or
(g) There is any
other basis consistent with the Constitutions of the State of Oregon and the
United States for the exercise of personal jurisdiction.
(2) The bases of
personal jurisdiction set forth in subsection (1) of this section or in any
other law of this state may not be used to acquire personal jurisdiction for a
tribunal of this state to modify a child support order of another state unless
the requirements of ORS 110.632 are met or, in the case of a foreign support
order, unless the requirements of ORS 110.639 are met. [2015 c.298 §7]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2018–2021 · leading case:
Vaughn v. Vaughn, 481 P.3d 932 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
Vaughn v. Vaughn, 481 P.3d 932 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
· cites it 26× “In response to father’s motion, daughter argued, in part, that the court had personal jurisdiction under ORCP 4 B and ORS 110.518. ORCP 4 provides that an Oregon court “has jurisdiction over a party” under specific circumstances.”
In re Albar, 424 P.3d 774 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 5× “]" ORS 110.518 ; see also ORS 110.510(1) ("A tribunal of this state shall apply [Oregon's UIFSA] to a support proceeding involving * * * [a]n obligee, obligor, or child residing in a foreign country.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 110.518(1) — 1 case
Vaughn v. Vaughn, 481 P.3d 932 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
“In response to father’s motion, daughter argued, in part, that the court had personal jurisdiction under ORCP 4 B and ORS 110.518. ORCP 4 provides that an Oregon court “has jurisdiction over a party” under specific circumstances.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 110.518(1)(c) — 2 cases
Vaughn v. Vaughn, 481 P.3d 932 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
“In response to father’s motion, daughter argued, in part, that the court had personal jurisdiction under ORCP 4 B and ORS 110.518. ORCP 4 provides that an Oregon court “has jurisdiction over a party” under specific circumstances.”
In re Albar, 424 P.3d 774 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).
“]" ORS 110.518 ; see also ORS 110.510(1) ("A tribunal of this state shall apply [Oregon's UIFSA] to a support proceeding involving * * * [a]n obligee, obligor, or child residing in a foreign country.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 110.518(1)(e) — 1 case
Vaughn v. Vaughn, 481 P.3d 932 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
“In response to father’s motion, daughter argued, in part, that the court had personal jurisdiction under ORCP 4 B and ORS 110.518. ORCP 4 provides that an Oregon court “has jurisdiction over a party” under specific circumstances.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.