Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 112.049 (2026)

Petition for forfeiture of parent’s share

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      112.049 Petition for forfeiture of parent’s share. (1) A petition may be filed in probate proceedings to assert that the intestate share of a parent of a decedent is subject to forfeiture under ORS 112.047. A petition may be filed under this section only by a person who would be benefited by a forfeiture of the parent’s share.

      (2) A petition under this section must be filed not later than:

      (a) Four months after the date of delivery or mailing of the information described in ORS 113.145 if that information was required to be delivered or mailed to the person on whose behalf the petition is filed; or

      (b) If the person on whose behalf the petition is filed was not required to be named as an interested person in the petition for appointment of a personal representative:

      (A) Four months after the date of publication of notice to interested persons; or

      (B) If notice to interested persons was not published, one year after the decedent’s date of death.

      (3) The petitioner has the burden of proving the facts alleged in a petition filed under this section by:

      (a) If the petitioner is a child or sibling of the decedent, a preponderance of evidence; or

      (b) If the petitioner is not a child or sibling of the decedent, clear and convincing evidence. [2005 c.741 §3; 2019 c.461 §5; 2023 c.18 §4]

 

      112.050 [Repealed by 1969 c.591 §305]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: State v. Cue, 342 P.3d 98 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Cue, 342 P.3d 98 (Or. Ct. App. 2014). “035(9), a statement that the rights of the person in the estate may be barred unless the person proceeds as provided in ORS 112.049 within four months of the delivery or mailing of the information.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.