Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 124.130 (2026)

Statute of limitation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      124.130 Statute of limitation. An action under ORS 124.100 to 124.140 must be commenced within seven years after discovery of the conduct described in ORS 124.105 and 124.110 that gives rise to a cause of action under ORS 124.100 to 124.140. [1995 c.671 §6]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2024 · leading case: Swango v. Nationstar Sub1, LLC, 292 F. Supp. 3d 1134 (D. Or. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Swango v. Nationstar Sub1, LLC, 292 F. Supp. 3d 1134 (D. Or. 2018). · cites it 4× “Or. Rev. Stat. § 124.130 . The discovery rule in Oregon provides that a "claim accrues when the plaintiff has discovered facts or, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have discovered facts that would alert a reasonable person to the existence" of the claim.”
Landauer v. Landauer, 188 P.3d 406 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “Accordingly, under plaintiffs theory, the statutes of limitations under ORS 124.130 and ORS 12.110(1) did not begin to run until the time of Henry’s discovery of those facts in 2004.”
Classen v. Arete NW, LLC, 254 P.3d 216 (Or. Ct. App. 2012). “ORS 124.130. Plaintiff is not a vulnerable person within the meaning of that Act, and therefore, [p]laintiff cannot gain the benefit of its longer statute of limitations.”
Stevens v. Stevens (D. Or. 2024). · cites it 2× “725(11) (ORICO); ORS § 124.130 (financial abuse of a vulnerable person).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.