Or. Rev. Stat. § 144.185

Records and information available to board

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      144.185 Records and information available to board. Before making a determination regarding a prisoner’s release on parole as provided by ORS 144.125 or 144.397, the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision may cause to be brought before it current records and information regarding the prisoner, including:

      (1) Any relevant information which may be submitted by the prisoner, the prisoner’s attorney, the victim of the crime, the Department of Corrections, or by other persons;

      (2) The presentence investigation report specified in ORS 144.791 or if no such report has been prepared, a report of similar content prepared by institutional staff;

      (3) The reports of any physical, mental and psychiatric examinations of the prisoner;

      (4) The prisoner’s parole plan; and

      (5) Other relevant information concerning the prisoner as may be reasonably available. [1973 c.694 §6; 1981 c.426 §3; 1985 c.283 §3; 1987 c.320 §55; 2019 c.634 §26]

 

      Note: See note under 144.110.

 

      144.210 [Amended by 1959 c.101 §2; 1967 c.372 §8; 1969 c.597 §113; 1973 c.836 §288; repealed by 1985 c.283 §1]

 

      144.220 [Amended by 1959 c.101 §3; 1973 c.836 §289; repealed by 1975 c.564 §1 (144.221 enacted in lieu of 144.220)]

 

      144.221 [1975 c.564 §2 (enacted in lieu of 144.220); repealed by 1977 c.372 §18]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: Weidner v. Armenakis
Weidner v. Armenakis (1998) orctapp · cites it 8× “ORS 144.185 specifically authorizes the Board, before "making a determination regarding a prisoner's release on parole as provided by ORS 144.”
Harris v. Board of Parole (1980) orctapp · cites it 6× “180 (section 5 of the 1973 law), leaving only surviving from the 1973 law concerning the granting of paroles ORS 144.185 (section 6 of the 1973 law, relating to records and information available to the Board) and ORS 144.”
Mendacino v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision (2017) orctapp “125(1) (before releasing an inmate on parole, the board may “interview the prisoner to review the prisoner’s parole plan and psychiatric or psychological report, if any, and the record of the prisoner’s conduct during confinement”); ORS 144.185(3) (before making its final…”
Black v. Board of Parole (2025) orctapp · cites it 2× “135 (1995); allowing the board to consider various docu- ments and information, including the prisoner’s parole plan, in connection with an exit interview, ORS 144.185 (1995), amended by Or Laws 2019, ch 634, § 26, ORS 144.”
Burnett v. Lampert (2001) orctapp “See ORS 144.185. The Board was entitled to consider all of the information in the record when it considered whether to order a psychological evaluation.”
Wille v. Board of Parole & Post-Prision Supervision (2017) orctapp “OAR 291-038-0040; see also ORS 144.185 (before making a determination about parole, the board may cause to be brought before it, among other things, a presentence report or a report of similar nature prepared by institutional staff).”
Meriweather v. Board of Parole (1989) orctapp · cites it 2× “” There is no evidence that petitioner was “a representative selected by the victim,” and even if he was “next of kin,” he could not, as the criminal defendant, be a victim. ORS 131.007. 2 Accordingly, ORS 144.”
State ex rel. Travis v. Board of Parole (1998) orctapp “) ORS 144.185 provides that before making a release determination under ORS 144.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 144.185(3) — 1 case
Mendacino v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision (2017) orctapp “125(1) (before releasing an inmate on parole, the board may “interview the prisoner to review the prisoner’s parole plan and psychiatric or psychological report, if any, and the record of the prisoner’s conduct during confinement”); ORS 144.185(3) (before making its final…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.