Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 153.121

Appeal

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      153.121 Appeal. An appeal from a judgment in a violation proceeding may be taken by either party as follows:

      (1) From a proceeding in justice court or municipal court, as provided in ORS 138.057 for appeals of violations.

      (2) From a proceeding in circuit court, as provided in ORS chapter 19, except that the standard of review is the same as for an appeal from a judgment in a proceeding involving a misdemeanor or felony. [1999 c.1051 §28; 2005 c.266 §1]

 

      153.125 [1999 c.1051 §35; 2003 c.737 §105; 2009 c.659 §§2a,2c; repealed by 2011 c.597 §5]

 

      153.128 [1999 c.1051 §36; repealed by 2011 c.597 §5]

 

      153.130 [1981 c.692 §13; 1999 c.59 §29; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.131 [1999 c.1051 §37; 1999 c.1071 §§5c,5d; 2007 c.124 §2; repealed by 2011 c.597 §5]

 

      153.134 [1999 c.1051 §38; repealed by 2011 c.597 §5]

 

      153.138 [1999 c.1051 §39; repealed by 2011 c.597 §5]

 

      153.140 [1981 c.692 §15; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.142 [1999 c.1051 §34; repealed by 2011 c.597 §5]

 

      153.145 [1999 c.1051 §38a; repealed by 2011 c.597 §5]

 

      153.150 [1981 c.692 §16; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.160 [1981 c.692 §17; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.170 [1981 c.692 §18; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.180 [1981 c.692 §19; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.190 [1981 c.692 §20; 1985 c.272 §1; 1991 c.824 §3; 1995 c.292 §3; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.200 [1981 c.692 §21; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.210 [1981 c.692 §22; 1985 c.725 §10; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.220 [1981 c.692 §23; 1995 c.658 §80; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.230 [1981 c.692 §24; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.240 [1981 c.692 §25; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.250 [1981 c.692 §26; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.260 [1981 c.692 §27; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.270 [1981 c.692 §8; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.280 [1981 c.692 §28; 1985 c.342 §21; 1995 c.658 §81; 1997 c.389 §13; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.290 [1981 c.692 §29; repealed by 1995 c.292 §8]

 

      153.300 [1981 c.692 §30; repealed by 1995 c.292 §8]

 

      153.310 [1981 c.692 §9; 1993 c.531 §4; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.325 [1981 c.626 §5; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.330 [Formerly 488.210; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.335 [Formerly 488.220; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.340 [Formerly 488.230; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.345 [Formerly 488.240; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.350 [Formerly 488.250; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.355 [Formerly 488.260; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.360 [Formerly 488.270; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.365 [Formerly 488.280; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.370 [Formerly 488.290; 1985 c.272 §2; 1991 c.931 §§2,2a; 1995 c.292 §4; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.375 [Formerly 488.300; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.380 [1981 c.626 §6; 1985 c.725 §11; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.385 [1981 c.626 §7; 1995 c.658 §82; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.390 [1981 c.626 §8; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.395 [1981 c.626 §10; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.400 [1981 c.626 §11; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.405 [1981 c.626 §12; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.410 [1981 c.626 §13; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.415 [1981 c.626 §14; 1985 c.342 §22; 1995 c.658 §83; 1997 c.389 §14; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.420 [1981 c.626 §15; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.425 [1981 c.626 §16; repealed by 1995 c.292 §8]

 

      153.430 [1981 c.626 §17; repealed by 1995 c.292 §8]

 

      153.440 [1981 c.626 §9; 1993 c.531 §5; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.500 [Formerly 484.010; 1987 c.730 §6; 1991 c.67 §30; 1991 c.208 §4; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.505 [Formerly 484.350; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.510 [Formerly 484.155; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.515 [Formerly 484.150; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.520 [Formerly 484.160; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.525 [Formerly 484.170; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

      153.527 [1989 c.355 §1; repealed by 1999 c.1051 §32]

 

TRAFFIC OFFENSES

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2004–2024 · leading case: ESLAMIZAR
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
ESLAMIZAR (2004) bia “Or. Rev. Stat. § 153.121 (2003). However, Oregon’s offense classification system defines “crimes” and “violations” in mutually exclusive terms, stating that “[a]n offense is either a crime .”
City of Eugene v. Morrison (2024) orctapp · cites it 6× “Defendant maintains that he had a right to appeal his default judgment Cite as 333 Or App 730 (2024) 733 for a de novo trial in circuit court as provided in ORS 153.121 and ORS 138.057. Second, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his demurrer because his…”
City of Eugene v. Morrison (2024) orctapp · cites it 6× “Defendant maintains that he had a right to appeal his default judgment Cite as 333 Or App 730 (2024) 733 for a de novo trial in circuit court as provided in ORS 153.121 and ORS 138.057. Second, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his demurrer because his…”
City of Eugene v. Morrison (2024) orctapp · cites it 6× “Defendant maintains that he had a right to appeal his default judgment Cite as 333 Or App 730 (2024) 733 for a de novo trial in circuit court as provided in ORS 153.121 and ORS 138.057. Second, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his demurrer because his…”
City of Eugene v. Hejazi (2019) orctapp “134 and ORS 153.121, that, by their terms, address appellate authority related to circuit court judgments in cases originating in municipal court or involving offenses defined by municipal ordinance.”
State v. Walker (2020) orctapp “See ORS 153.121(1) (providing for appeals from justice courts in violation cases); ORS 138.”
State v. Hayes (2006) orctapp “ORS 153.121(2). We proceed to the merits of defendant’s first assignment of error.”
State v. Rowe (2006) orctapp “ORS 153.121(2). Defendant participated in a demonstration held by a group of bicyclists in Portland on September 24, 2004.”
State v. Patrick (2012) orctapp “Defendant appealed the municipal court’s judgment to circuit court, ORS 153.121; ORS 138.057, contending that the municipal court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the citation on a number of grounds.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 153.121(1) — 4 cases
City of Eugene v. Morrison (2024) orctapp “Defendant maintains that he had a right to appeal his default judgment Cite as 333 Or App 730 (2024) 733 for a de novo trial in circuit court as provided in ORS 153.121 and ORS 138.057. Second, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his demurrer because his…”
City of Eugene v. Morrison (2024) orctapp “Defendant maintains that he had a right to appeal his default judgment Cite as 333 Or App 730 (2024) 733 for a de novo trial in circuit court as provided in ORS 153.121 and ORS 138.057. Second, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his demurrer because his…”
City of Eugene v. Morrison (2024) orctapp “Defendant maintains that he had a right to appeal his default judgment Cite as 333 Or App 730 (2024) 733 for a de novo trial in circuit court as provided in ORS 153.121 and ORS 138.057. Second, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his demurrer because his…”
State v. Walker (2020) orctapp “See ORS 153.121(1) (providing for appeals from justice courts in violation cases); ORS 138.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 153.121(2) — 2 cases
State v. Hayes (2006) orctapp “ORS 153.121(2). We proceed to the merits of defendant’s first assignment of error.”
State v. Rowe (2006) orctapp “ORS 153.121(2). Defendant participated in a demonstration held by a group of bicyclists in Portland on September 24, 2004.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.