Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 167.095 (2026)

Defenses in prosecutions under ORS 167.090

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      167.095 Defenses in prosecutions under ORS 167.090. In any prosecution for violation of ORS 167.090, it shall be an affirmative defense for the defendant to prove:

      (1) That the public display, even though in connection with a commercial venture, was primarily for artistic purposes or as a public service; or

      (2) That the public display was of nudity, exhibited by a bona fide art, antique or similar gallery or exhibition, and visible in a normal display setting. [1971 c.743 §262]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1995–2006 · leading case: State v. Vasquez-Rubio, 897 P.2d 324 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Vasquez-Rubio, 897 P.2d 324 (Or. Ct. App. 1995). “085; ORS 167.095; ORS 167.142; ORS 167.147(3); ORS 167.”
State v. Flajole, 129 P.3d 770 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “035 (1971) (same in prosecution for theft); ORS 167.095 (1971) (same in prosecution for public display of nudity); ORS 683.”
State v. Atkeson, 954 P.2d 181 (Or. Ct. App. 1998). “060 to ORS 167.095. The definition of “obscene performance” specifically includes sexual conduct “whether pictured, animated or live.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.