Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 190.030 (2026)

Effect of agreement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      190.030 Effect of agreement. (1) When an agreement under ORS 190.010 has been entered into, the unit of local government, consolidated department, intergovernmental entity or administrative officer designated therein to perform specified functions or activities is vested with all powers, rights and duties relating to those functions and activities that are vested by law in each separate party to the agreement, its officers and agencies.

      (2) An officer designated in an agreement to perform specified duties, functions or activities of two or more public officers shall be considered to be holding only one office.

      (3) An elective office may not be terminated by an agreement under ORS 190.010. [Amended by 1967 c.550 §6; 1991 c.583 §2]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1985–1998 · leading case: Nw. Nat. Gas Co. v. City of Portland, 711 P.2d 119 (Or. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nw. Nat. Gas Co. v. City of Portland, 711 P.2d 119 (Or. 1985). “ties as necessary to conform to the Project, to the extent that the City has the power to do so’; and “C) That if the City of Portland cannot cause relocation of privately-owned utilities without cost to the City of Portland or the LRT Project, Tri Met shall relocate them or…”
City of Medford v. Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Auth., 963 P.2d 120 (Or. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “]” ORS 190.030(1). We note at the outset that each of the cities is authorized to collect a “sewage charge” by ORS 224.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 190.030(1) — 2 cases
Nw. Nat. Gas Co. v. City of Portland, 711 P.2d 119 (Or. 1985). “ties as necessary to conform to the Project, to the extent that the City has the power to do so’; and “C) That if the City of Portland cannot cause relocation of privately-owned utilities without cost to the City of Portland or the LRT Project, Tri Met shall relocate them or…”
City of Medford v. Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Auth., 963 P.2d 120 (Or. Ct. App. 1998). “]” ORS 190.030(1). We note at the outset that each of the cities is authorized to collect a “sewage charge” by ORS 224.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.