Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 195.530 (2026)

Noncamping use of public property by homeless individuals; attorney fees

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      195.530 Noncamping use of public property by homeless individuals; attorney fees. (1) As used in this section:

      (a) “City or county law” does not include policies developed pursuant to ORS 195.500 or 195.505.

      (b)(A) “Keeping warm and dry” means using measures necessary for an individual to survive outdoors given the environmental conditions.

      (B) “Keeping warm and dry” does not include using any measure that involves fire or flame.

      (c) “Public property” has the meaning given that term in ORS 131.705.

      (2) Any city or county law that regulates the acts of sitting, lying, sleeping or keeping warm and dry outdoors on public property that is open to the public must be objectively reasonable as to time, place and manner with regards to persons experiencing homelessness.

      (3) It is an affirmative defense to a charge of violating a city or county law described in subsection (2) of this section that the law is not objectively reasonable.

      (4) A person experiencing homelessness may bring suit for injunctive or declaratory relief to challenge the objective reasonableness of a city or county law described in subsection (2) of this section. The action must be brought in the circuit court of the county that enacted the law or of the county in which the city that enacted the law is located.

      (5) For purposes of subsections (2) and (3) of this section, reasonableness shall be determined based on the totality of the circumstances, including, but not limited to, the impact of the law on persons experiencing homelessness.

      (6) In any suit brought pursuant to subsection (4) of this section, the court, in its discretion, may award reasonable attorney fees to a prevailing plaintiff if the plaintiff:

      (a) Was not seeking to vindicate an interest unique to the plaintiff; and

      (b) At least 90 days before the action was filed, provided written notice to the governing body of the city or county that enacted the law being challenged of an intent to bring the action and the notice provided the governing body with actual notice of the basis upon which the plaintiff intends to challenge the law.

      (7) Nothing in this section creates a private right of action for monetary damages for any person. [2021 c.370 §1]

 

      Note: 195.530 was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 195 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.

 

MISCELLANEOUS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2023–2026 · leading case: City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, 603 U.S. 520 (2024).
City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, 603 U.S. 520 (2024). · cites it 2× “For its part, the Constitution provides many additional limits on state prose- cutorial power, promising fair notice of the laws and equal treatment under them, forbidding selective prosecutions, and much more besides.”
City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, 603 U.S. 520 (2024). · cites it 2× “For its part, the Constitution provides many additional limits on state prosecutorial power, promising fair notice of the laws and equal treatment under them, forbidding selective prosecutions, and much more besides.”
Gloria Johnson v. City of Grants Pass (9th Cir. 2023). · cites it 3× “” Or. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 195.530 (2). The statute specifies that “[k]eeping warm and dry means using measures necessary for an individual to survive outdoors given the environmental conditions” but it “does not include any measure that involves fire or flame.”
John Lee Malaer v. Curry Cnty., et al. (D. Or. 2026). “Under ORS 195.530(1)(c), “public property” has meaning given by ORS 131.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 195.530(1)(c) — 1 case
John Lee Malaer v. Curry Cnty., et al. (D. Or. 2026). “Under ORS 195.530(1)(c), “public property” has meaning given by ORS 131.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 195.530(2) — 2 cases
City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, 603 U.S. 520 (2024). “For its part, the Constitution provides many additional limits on state prose- cutorial power, promising fair notice of the laws and equal treatment under them, forbidding selective prosecutions, and much more besides.”
City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, 603 U.S. 520 (2024). “For its part, the Constitution provides many additional limits on state prosecutorial power, promising fair notice of the laws and equal treatment under them, forbidding selective prosecutions, and much more besides.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.