Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 196.105 (2026)

Definitions for ORS 196.105 to 196.125

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      196.105 Definitions for ORS 196.105 to 196.125. As used in ORS 196.105 to 196.125:

      (1) “Commission” means the Columbia River Gorge Commission established under section 5 of the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act, P.L. 99-663.

      (2) “General management area” means the area within the scenic area that is not an urban area or special management area.

      (3) “Management plan” means the management plan for the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area adopted by the commission.

      (4) “Special management area” means any area identified as such in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act.

      (5) “Urban area” means the 13 towns or cities as identified in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act. [1987 c.856 §1; 1993 c.317 §1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2009–2010 · leading case: Friends v. Columbia River (s055915), 212 P.3d 1243 (Or. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Friends v. Columbia River (s055915), 212 P.3d 1243 (Or. 2009). “" ORS 196.105(2). [2] The Act encouraged the counties to comply with that provision by conditioning their receipt of certain economic development grants on the adoption of land use ordinances consistent with the management plan.”
Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n, 238 P.3d 378 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “In addition, the statutes that the Oregon legislature *483 enacted to implement the Act, ORS 196.105 to 196.165, define the term to mean “the area within the scenic area that is not an urban area or special management area.”
Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n, 213 P.3d 1191 (Or. 2009). “” ORS 196.105(2). 4 The commission’s rules also are on file at the commission’s office and can be found on its web site at http://www.”
Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n, 212 P.3d 1243 (Or. 2009). “” ORS 196.105(2). 2 The Act encouraged the counties to comply with that provision by conditioning their receipt of certain economic development grants on the adoption of land use ordinances consistent with the management plan.”
Columbia Gorge Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge, 238 P.3d 378 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “[3] Throughout this opinion, we quote the 2004 version of the management plan, as amended through June 2007. However, the provisions affected by the plan amendment at issue in this case have remained unchanged since adoption of the plan in 1991.”
Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Columbia River (Or. 2009). “" ORS 196.105(2). Return to previous location .”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 196.105(2) — 6 cases
Friends v. Columbia River (s055915), 212 P.3d 1243 (Or. 2009). “" ORS 196.105(2). [2] The Act encouraged the counties to comply with that provision by conditioning their receipt of certain economic development grants on the adoption of land use ordinances consistent with the management plan.”
Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n, 213 P.3d 1191 (Or. 2009). “” ORS 196.105(2). 4 The commission’s rules also are on file at the commission’s office and can be found on its web site at http://www.”
Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n, 212 P.3d 1243 (Or. 2009). “” ORS 196.105(2). 2 The Act encouraged the counties to comply with that provision by conditioning their receipt of certain economic development grants on the adoption of land use ordinances consistent with the management plan.”
Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Comm'n, 238 P.3d 378 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “In addition, the statutes that the Oregon legislature *483 enacted to implement the Act, ORS 196.105 to 196.165, define the term to mean “the area within the scenic area that is not an urban area or special management area.”
Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Columbia River (Or. 2009). “" ORS 196.105(2). Return to previous location .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.