Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 199.463 (2026)

Notice; hearing

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

199.463 Notice; hearing. (1) Notice of a public hearing conducted by a boundary commission under ORS 199.461 shall be published by at least one insertion in a newspaper of general circulation in the affected city, district or territory not more than 25 days nor less than 15 days before the hearing. A second notice may be published either by a second insertion in a newspaper of general circulation in the affected city, district or territory or by letter sent first-class mail addressed to each owner of land in the affected territory not more than 15 days nor less than 8 days before the hearing. The commission may also cause the notice to be posted in not less than three public places within the affected city, district or territory at least 15 days before the hearing. The commission may provide for publication by broadcasting on radio or television stations.

(2) Notice of a hearing shall describe the proposed boundary change or application under ORS 199.464, state the time and place of the hearing and that any interested person may appear and shall be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard.

(3) A hearing may be adjourned or continued to another time so long as notice of the continued hearing meets the requirements of ORS chapter 193. [Formerly 199.520; 1983 c.336 §8; 1989 c.92 §18]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1979–2010 · leading case: McGowan v. Lane Cnty. Local Gov't Boundary Comm'n, 795 P.2d 560 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

McGowan v. Lane Cnty. Local Gov't Boundary Comm'n, 795 P.2d 560 (Or. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 4× “461 to ORS 199.463 inapplicable. No notice is required by ORS 199.”

Fosses v. Portland Metro. Area Local Gov't Boundary Comm'n, 603 P.2d 1235 (Or. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “ORS 199.463 provides, "(1) Notice of a public hearing conducted by a boundary commission under ORS 199.”

Mid-Cnty. Future Alternatives Comm. v. Portland Metro. Area Local Gov't Boundary Comm'n, 728 P.2d 63 (Or. Ct. App. 1987). “461; ORS 199.463. Any interested person may seek judicial review of the commission’s order.”

Rivergate Residents Ass'n v. Land Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 590 P.2d 1233 (Or. Ct. App. 1979). “The Boundary Commission held a public hearing on the annexation proposal as required by ORS 199.463, and petitioner was represented at that hearing by an attorney who presented its objections to the proposal.”

Mcgowan v. Lane Cty. L. Gov. Bdry. Com'n, 795 P.2d 560 (Or. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 3× “461 to ORS 199.463 inapplicable. No notice is required by ORS 199.”

Bellinger v. Lane Cnty. Local Gov't Boundary Comm'n, 915 P.2d 430 (Or. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “463(3)? “Petitioners contend the answer to this question inheres in the requirement of an ‘analysis and recommendation’ under ORS 199.”

Citizens Against Annexation v. Lane Cnty. Local Gov't Boundary Comm'n, 226 P.3d 711 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “490(2)(a) — for annexation of territory to the City of Florence, described in attached Exhibit A and shown on attached map Exhibit B; and, “WHEREAS, the commission duly published notice of the public hearing in accordance with ORS 199.463 and in accordance with the rules of the…”

— Or. Rev. Stat. § 199.463(3) — 1 case

Bellinger v. Lane Cnty. Local Gov't Boundary Comm'n, 915 P.2d 430 (Or. Ct. App. 1996). “463(3)? “Petitioners contend the answer to this question inheres in the requirement of an ‘analysis and recommendation’ under ORS 199.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.