Or. Rev. Stat. § 199.534

Legislative annexation of territory to cities and districts; effective date; effect on other minor boundary changes

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

199.534 Legislative annexation of territory to cities and districts; effective date; effect on other minor boundary changes. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter or ORS chapter 222, territory annexed or transferred to a city or district by a minor boundary change approved by a boundary commission’s final order adopted after January 1, 1985, but before July 18, 1987, shall be in the annexing city or district by operation of ORS 198.855, 199.490, 199.531, 199.534, 222.120 and 222.170 to 222.177 commencing upon the effective date of the boundary commission’s final order. The creation by ORS 198.855, 199.490, 199.531, 199.534, 222.120 and 222.170 to 222.177 of annexations shall not void or impair any prior or subsequent minor boundary changes inside or outside of the affected territory. [1987 c.818 §3]

199.535 [1969 c.494 §23; renumbered 199.457]

199.540 [1969 c.494 §24; 1971 c.462 §13; renumbered 199.487]

CITY-COUNTY CONSOLIDATION

(Generally)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1988–2020 · leading case: Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. City of Portland

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. City of Portland (1990) or · cites it 3× “This is a declaratory judgment proceeding in which plaintiffs seek a declaration that Oregon Laws 1987, chapter 818, section 3 (codified as ORS 199.534), 1 violates the home rule provisions of the Oregon Constitution, Article XI, section 2, 2 and the equal privileges and…”

Donaldson v. Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission (1988) orctapp · cites it 5× “4 City contends, in A44848, A44849, A44850 and A45837 only, that the petitions do not raise a justiciable controversy, because the parcels were legislatively annexed to City by Oregon Laws 1987, chapter 818, section 3, now codified as ORS 199.534, which provides:…”

City of Corvallis v. State of Oregon (2020) orctapp “Similarly, in Mid-County, local boundary commis- sions relied on ORS 199.534 to order the cities of Portland and Gresham to annex certain territory, and the cities sought to have the statute declared unconstitutional under the home-rule provisions of the Oregon Constitution.”

Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. City of Portland (1989) orctapp “1 The section was codified as ORS 199.534. However, the codified version erroneously substituted the words “by operation of ORS 198.”

Donaldson v. Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission (1990) or “Petitioners, who are individual residents of Santa Clara, seek review in this court, claiming that: (1) the annexations were unlawful because Santa Clara was a “proposed city,” and territory in a “proposed city” cannot be annexed to another city; (2) four of the annexations were…”

Donaldson v. LANE CTY. L. GOV. BDRY. COM'N (1990) or “Petitioners, who are individual residents of Santa Clara, seek review in this court, claiming that: (1) the annexations were unlawful because Santa Clara was a "proposed city," and territory in a "proposed city" cannot be annexed to another city; (2) four of the annexations were…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.