Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 223.405 (2026)

Definitions for ORS 223.405 to 223.485

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

223.405 Definitions for ORS 223.405 to 223.485. As used in ORS 223.405 to 223.485, unless the context requires otherwise, “objection” includes remonstrances. [Amended by 1965 c.282 §5; 1991 c.902 §42]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1968–1982 · leading case: Wing v. City of Eugene, 437 P.2d 836 (Or. 1968).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wing v. City of Eugene, 437 P.2d 836 (Or. 1968). · cites it 2× “Reassessment procedure is in ORS 223.405 through 223.485. ORS 223.401 provides that review of the council’s action may be by writ of review under ORS 34.”

Heritage Square Dev. Co. v. City of Sandy, 648 P.2d 1317 (Or. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “If only the assessment were void, ORS 223.405 to 223.485 would allow the city to avoid the defects in the assessment proceedings and to reassess within constutitional and statutory limits for up to the full cost of the improvement.”

Brown v. City of Salem, 444 P.2d 936 (Or. 1968). “The part enjoining the city from enforcing the assessment liens is modified to permit the city to exercise whatever reassessment rights it may have under the City of Salem Charter Section 79A and ORS 223.405 et seq. Costs are awarded to the plaintiff.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.