243.696
Bargaining representatives for executive department state agencies, judicial
department and legislative department.
(1) The Oregon Department of Administrative Services shall represent all state
agencies within the executive department which have bargaining units in
collective bargaining negotiations with the certified or recognized exclusive
representatives of all appropriate bargaining units of exempt, unclassified and
classified employees, except those unclassified employees governed by the
provisions of ORS 240.240. The department may delegate such collective
bargaining responsibility to operating agencies as may be appropriate.
(2) The Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court shall represent the judicial department in
collective bargaining negotiations with the certified or recognized exclusive
representatives of all appropriate bargaining units of officers and employees
of the courts of this state who are state officers or employees. The Chief
Justice may delegate such collective bargaining responsibility to the state
court administrator.
(3) The presiding
officers of each house of the Legislative Assembly shall represent the
legislative department in collective bargaining negotiations with the certified
or recognized exclusive representatives of all appropriate bargaining units of
employees of the legislative department. The presiding officers may delegate
such collective bargaining responsibility to a chief negotiator who, after
consultation with the majority party and the minority party caucus leaders of
the Senate and the House of Representatives, shall establish a bargaining team
to carry out the collective bargaining negotiations. [1973 c.536 §10; 1979
c.468 §25; 1983 c.763 §64; 2021 c.656 §1]
Notes of Decisions
Oregon AFSCME Council 75 v. OJD - Yamhill Cnty., 304 Or. App. 794 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 9× “When ORS 243.696 was amended, multiple petitions were pending before ERB seeking to certify different configurations of bargaining units for OJD employees.”
Am. Fed'n of State v. Exec. Dep't, 628 P.2d 1228 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
· cites it 6× “We conclude this was the intention of the legislature in enacting ORS 243.696 and ORS 243.742. Whether or not an arbitrator may unilaterally modify a salary range for a position, we need not decide here, because the state has presented us with no figures to indicate that this is…”
AFSCME Council 75, Local 350 v. Clackamas Cnty., 687 P.2d 1102 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
· cites it 2× “’ ORS 243.696(1).[ 5 ] “We therefore hold that while the State Personnel Division retains the power to group all job positions into classes and to adopt, pursuant to ORS 240.”
Lent v. Emp. Relations Bd., 664 P.2d 1110 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).
· cites it 5× “3 At oral argument in this court plaintiff placed some reliance on ORS 243.696, a section of PECBA which provides: “The Executive Department of the State of Oregon shall represent all state agencies which have bargaining units in collective bargaining negotiations with the…”
AFSCME Local 1246 v. Fairview Training Ctr., 724 P.2d 895 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).
“ORS 243.696 to 243.762. Furthermore, *169 Fairview alleged in its redesignation petition that the unit was a mix of guards and non-guards, and the only real issue in that case was whether it was appropriate to retain the mixed unit.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.696(1) — 2 cases
Am. Fed'n of State v. Exec. Dep't, 628 P.2d 1228 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
“We conclude this was the intention of the legislature in enacting ORS 243.696 and ORS 243.742. Whether or not an arbitrator may unilaterally modify a salary range for a position, we need not decide here, because the state has presented us with no figures to indicate that this is…”
AFSCME Council 75, Local 350 v. Clackamas Cnty., 687 P.2d 1102 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
“’ ORS 243.696(1).[ 5 ] “We therefore hold that while the State Personnel Division retains the power to group all job positions into classes and to adopt, pursuant to ORS 240.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.696(2) — 1 case
Oregon AFSCME Council 75 v. OJD - Yamhill Cnty., 304 Or. App. 794 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
“When ORS 243.696 was amended, multiple petitions were pending before ERB seeking to certify different configurations of bargaining units for OJD employees.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.