243.766 Board
duties in administration of collective bargaining laws; rules. The Employment Relations Board
shall:
(1) Establish
procedures for, investigate and resolve any disputes concerning the designation
of an appropriate bargaining unit.
(2) Establish
procedures for, resolve disputes with respect to, and supervise the conduct of
elections for the determination of employee representation.
(3) Conduct
proceedings on complaints of unfair labor practices by employers, employees and
labor organizations and take such actions with respect thereto as it deems
necessary and proper.
(4) Petition the
appropriate circuit court for enforcement of any order issued by the board
pursuant to ORS 243.650 to 243.809.
(5) Hold such
hearings and make such inquiries as it deems necessary to carry out properly
its functions and powers, and for the purpose of such hearings and inquiries,
administer oaths and affirmations, examine witnesses and documents and issue
subpoenas.
(6) Conduct
studies on problems relating to public employment relations and make
recommendations with respect thereto to the legislative bodies; request
information and data from state and county departments and agencies and labor
organizations necessary to carry out its functions and responsibilities; make
available to public employers, labor organizations, mediators, members of
fact-finding boards, arbitrators and other concerned parties statistical data
relating to wages, benefits, and employment practices in public and private
employment to assist them in resolving issues in negotiation.
(7) Adopt rules
relative to the exercise of its powers and authority and to govern the
proceedings before it in accordance with ORS chapter 183. [1973 c.536 §24]
243.770 [1965 c.390 §5; 1971 c.582 §10;
repealed by 1973 c.536 §39]
Notes of Decisions
Elvin v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 793 P.2d 338 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
· cites it 8× “" They assert that ERB did not impose a civil penalty, but simply fashioned a remedy to return fair share payments to respondents that OPEU had no right to retain, because the union's collection of the fees was a violation of the First Amendment.”
Springfield Educ. Ass'n v. Springfield Sch. Dist. No. 19, 621 P.2d 547 (Or. 1980).
“7 The Employment Relations Board is mandated by ORS 243.766 to oversee that system. Pertinent to ERB’s order in this case, subsection (3) grants broad authority for ERB to: *232 "Conduct proceedings on complaints of unfair labor practices by employers, employes and labor…”
Circuit Court v. AFSCME Local 502-A, 669 P.2d 314 (Or. 1983).
· cites it 2× “742; conduct proceedings on complaints of unfair labor practices by employers, employes and labor unions, adopt rules and monitor elections, ORS 243.766. [4] We note that these counselors have been included within respondent union since union certification in March 1974 and…”
Tualatin Valley Bargaining Council v. Tigard Sch. Dist. 23J, 840 P.2d 657 (Or. 1992).
· cites it 6× “" [7] ERB has the power to "establish procedures" relative to disputes and elections, ORS 243.766(1) and (2), and to "[a]dopt rules relative to the exercise of its powers and authority," ORS 243.”
Am. Fed'n of State v. Exec. Dep't, 628 P.2d 1228 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
· cites it 2× “[11] ERB must, pursuant to ORS 243.766(4), petition the appropriate circuit court for enforcement of any order on an unfair labor practice, representation matter or arbitration issue which is not voluntarily complied with.”
City of Beaverton v. Int'l Ass'n of Fire Fighters, 531 P.2d 730 (Or. Ct. App. 1975).
· cites it 2× “This the constitution forbids and thus we must reverse the order of PERB which purported to invalidate in its entirety Beaverton Ordinance 1700, since that ordinance legis *308 lates, at least in part, on matters of predominantly local concern.”
Amalgamated Transit Union, Div. 757 v. Tri-Cnty. Metro. Transp. Dist., 282 P.3d 2 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “ATU, relying on ORS 243.766(3), 2 contends that the board has broad remedial authority to fashion an appropriate remedy when it finds an unfair labor practice and asserts that the board’s actions fell within that authority in this instance.”
Port of Portland v. Mun. Employees, Local 483, 556 P.2d 692 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).
“686, under procedures established by the Employment Relations Board, ORS 243.766(2). The procedures adopted by the Board include the following: "* * * Appropriate notices of election shall be furnished by the executive secretary to the public employer for suitable posting.”
Oregon State Employes Ass'n v. State, 535 P.2d 1385 (Or. Ct. App. 1975).
· cites it 2× “ORS 243.766 (4). [4] We express no view on the accuracy of the apparent feelings of the Board members.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.766(1) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.766(2) — 2 cases
Port of Portland v. Mun. Employees, Local 483, 556 P.2d 692 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).
“686, under procedures established by the Employment Relations Board, ORS 243.766(2). The procedures adopted by the Board include the following: "* * * Appropriate notices of election shall be furnished by the executive secretary to the public employer for suitable posting.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.766(3) — 7 cases
Elvin v. Oregon Pub. Employees Union, 793 P.2d 338 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
“" They assert that ERB did not impose a civil penalty, but simply fashioned a remedy to return fair share payments to respondents that OPEU had no right to retain, because the union's collection of the fees was a violation of the First Amendment.”
Amalgamated Transit Union, Div. 757 v. Tri-Cnty. Metro. Transp. Dist., 282 P.3d 2 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
“ATU, relying on ORS 243.766(3), 2 contends that the board has broad remedial authority to fashion an appropriate remedy when it finds an unfair labor practice and asserts that the board’s actions fell within that authority in this instance.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.766(4) — 5 cases
Am. Fed'n of State v. Exec. Dep't, 628 P.2d 1228 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
“[11] ERB must, pursuant to ORS 243.766(4), petition the appropriate circuit court for enforcement of any order on an unfair labor practice, representation matter or arbitration issue which is not voluntarily complied with.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 243.766(7) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.