Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 250.125 (2026)

Estimate of financial impact of state measures; financial estimate committee; application to Native American or American Indian tribal governments; notice in voters’ pamphlet if no funding source identified

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      250.125 Estimate of financial impact of state measures; financial estimate committee; application to Native American or American Indian tribal governments; notice in voters’ pamphlet if no funding source identified. (1) When a state measure involves expenditure of public moneys by the state, reduction of expenditure of public moneys by the state, reduction of state revenues or raising of funds by the state by imposing any tax or incurring any indebtedness, the financial estimate committee created under this section shall estimate:

      (a) The amount of direct expenditure, direct reduction of expenditure, direct reduction in state revenues, direct tax revenue or indebtedness and interest that will be required to meet the provisions of the measure if it is enacted; and

      (b) The aggregate amount of direct expenditure, direct reduction of expenditure, direct reduction in revenues, direct tax revenue or indebtedness and interest that will be required by any city, county or district to meet the provisions of the measure if it is enacted.

      (2) For a state measure for which an estimate is required to be prepared under subsection (1) of this section, the financial estimate committee may estimate the aggregate amount of direct expenditure, direct reduction of expenditure, direct reduction in revenues, direct tax revenue or indebtedness and interest that will be required by any federally recognized Native American or American Indian tribal government to meet the provisions of the measure if it is enacted.

      (3) If the Legislative Assembly has enacted a law that will apply only if the measure for which an estimate is required to be prepared under subsection (1) of this section is not enacted, the financial estimate committee may also estimate the amount of direct expenditure, direct reduction of expenditure, direct reduction in revenues, direct tax revenue or indebtedness and interest that will result for the state, any city, county or district or any federally recognized Native American or American Indian tribal government if the measure is not enacted.

      (4) For a state measure for which an estimate is required to be prepared under subsection (1) of this section, the financial estimate committee shall consult with the Legislative Revenue Officer to determine if the measure has potentially significant indirect economic or fiscal effects. If the committee determines that the indirect economic or fiscal effects of the measure are significant and can be estimated, the Legislative Revenue Officer shall prepare on behalf of the committee an impartial estimate of the indirect economic or fiscal effects of the measure. The Legislative Revenue Officer shall use the best available economic models and data to produce the estimate. The financial estimate committee shall incorporate relevant parts of the estimate prepared by the Legislative Revenue Officer into the estimate prepared by the committee under subsection (1) of this section.

      (5) Except as provided in subsection (6) of this section, the estimates described in subsections (1) to (3) of this section shall be printed in the voters’ pamphlet and on the ballot. The estimates shall be impartial, simple and understandable and shall include the following information:

      (a) A statement of the amount of financial effect on state, local or tribal government expenditures, revenues or indebtedness, expressed as a specific amount or as a range of amounts;

      (b) A statement of any recurring annual amount of financial effect on state, local or tribal government expenditures, revenues or indebtedness;

      (c) A description of the most likely financial effect or effects of the adoption of the measure; and

      (d) If an estimate is made under subsection (3) of this section, a description of the most likely financial effect or effects if the measure is not enacted.

      (6) If the financial estimate committee determines that the measure will have no financial effect on state, local or tribal government expenditures, revenues or indebtedness or that the financial effect on state, local or tribal government expenditures, revenues or indebtedness will not exceed $100,000, the committee shall prepare and file with the Secretary of State a statement declaring that the measure will have no financial effect or that the financial effect will not exceed $100,000. The statement shall be printed in the voters’ pamphlet and on the ballot.

      (7) If the financial estimate committee determines that the measure will have a financial effect on state, local or tribal government expenditures in excess of $100,000 and that the measure does not include a dedicated funding source to pay for the new expenditures required, the committee shall prepare and file with the Secretary of State the statement “MEASURE SPENDS MONEY WITHOUT IDENTIFYING A FUNDING SOURCE.” A statement prepared under this subsection shall be printed in bold in the voters’ pamphlet immediately following the printing of the estimates described in subsections (1) to (3) of this section.

      (8) In addition to the estimates described in subsections (1) to (3) of this section, if the financial estimate committee considers it necessary, the committee may prepare and file with the Secretary of State an impartial, simple and understandable statement explaining the financial effects of the measure. The statement may not exceed 500 words. The statement shall be printed in the voters’ pamphlet with the measure to which it relates.

      (9) The Legislative Policy and Research Committee shall provide any administrative staff assistance required by the financial estimate committee to facilitate the work of the financial estimate committee under this section or ORS 250.127.

      (10) The financial estimate committee is created, consisting of the Secretary of State, the State Treasurer, the Director of the Oregon Department of Administrative Services, the Director of the Department of Revenue and a representative of a city, county or district with expertise in local government finance. The representative of a city, county or district shall be selected by the four other members of the financial estimate committee and shall serve for a term of two years that begins on March 1 of the odd-numbered year. [Formerly 254.180; 1987 c.724 §6; 1991 c.971 §1; 1993 c.493 §15; 1999 c.844 §1; 2005 c.633 §1; 2013 c.47 §1; 2016 c.88 §11; 2019 c.603 §1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases, 1980–2016 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Bunn v. Roberts, 726 P.2d 925 (Or. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Bunn v. Roberts, 726 P.2d 925 (Or. 1986). · cites it 26× “The four defendants together constitute the committee responsible for preparing an estimate of the amount of expenditure that would be required to meet the provisions of the measure if it were enacted under ORS 250.125, which provides: "When a state measure involves expenditure…”
State v. Montez, 789 P.2d 1352 (Or. 1990). · cites it 6× “Validity of Ballot Measures 6 and 7 Defendant argues that 1984 Ballot Measures 6 and 7, which enacted the Oregon death penalty scheme for aggravated murder, are invalid because Measure 6 included no financial estimate and because Measure 7's financial estimate did not satisfy…”
Marbet v. Keisling, 838 P.2d 580 (Or. 1992). · cites it 36× “131(1) and (2) provide: "(1) Any person alleging that an estimate required under ORS 250.125 was prepared, filed or certified in violation of the procedures specified in ORS 250.”
Bassien v. Buchanan, 798 P.2d 667 (Or. 1990). · cites it 26× “ORS 250.125 requires designated state officials to prepare financial estimates respecting specified state measures, which estimates shall be "certified" and "filed" not later than the 90th day before the election at which the measures are to be voted upon.”
Dennehy v. Roberts, 798 P.2d 663 (Or. 1990). · cites it 14× “ORS 250.125 provides: "When a state measure involves expenditure of public money by the state, reduction of expenditure of public money by the state, reduction of state revenues or raising of funds by the state by imposing any tax or incurring any indebtedness, the Secretary of…”
State Ex Rel. Keisling v. Norblad, 860 P.2d 241 (Or. 1993). · cites it 2× “The same statute provides that "[i]ncluded with each state measure shall be the measure number, the ballot title * * * and, if applicable, the financial estimates under ORS 250.125." ORS 254.085(3). On September 2, 1993, the Secretary of State certified HJR 10 to the counties as…”
Nelson v. Roberts, 789 P.2d 650 (Or. 1990). · cites it 2× “In support of his position, petitioner submitted estimates of the dollar amounts that would no longer be deposited in the state General Fund.”
Crumpton v. Roberts, 798 P.2d 1100 (Or. 1990). · cites it 2× “ORS 250.125 requires that the fiscal impact estimate be certified by the appropriate officials no later than 90 days before the general election.”
McCormick v. Brown, 333 P.3d 992 (Or. 2014). · cites it 9× “Respondents, members of the financial estimate committee created under ORS 250.125, have responded and concede that the procedures were not followed.”
Teledyne Indus., Inc. v. Paulus, 687 P.2d 1077 (Or. 1984). “Each measure shall be printed in the pamphlet with the number, ballot title and the financial estimate under ORS 250.125, if any, to be printed on the official ballot, and with the explanatory statement and arguments filed relating to it.”
MacAfee v. Paulus, 616 P.2d 493 (Or. 1980). “Each measure shall be printed in the pamphlet with the number, ballot title and the financial estimate under ORS 250.125, if any, to be printed on the official ballot, and with the explanatory statement and arguments filed relating to it.”
Burbidge v. Paulus, 609 P.2d 815 (Or. 1980). · cites it 2× “” *44 Second, when a state measure would reduce state revenues, ORS 250.125 requires that an estimate of the amount involved be printed in the voters’ pamphlet and on the ballot.”
Show all 21 citing cases →
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 250.125(1) — 4 cases
Marbet v. Keisling, 838 P.2d 580 (Or. 1992). “131(1) and (2) provide: "(1) Any person alleging that an estimate required under ORS 250.125 was prepared, filed or certified in violation of the procedures specified in ORS 250.”
State ex rel. Marbet v. Keisling, 838 P.2d 585 (Or. 1992).
Homuth v. Keisling, 838 P.2d 587 (Or. 1992).
Brummell v. Kulongoski, 921 P.2d 1310 (Or. 1996).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 250.125(2) — 2 cases
Marbet v. Keisling, 838 P.2d 580 (Or. 1992). “131(1) and (2) provide: "(1) Any person alleging that an estimate required under ORS 250.125 was prepared, filed or certified in violation of the procedures specified in ORS 250.”
Homuth v. Keisling, 838 P.2d 587 (Or. 1992).
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 250.125(3) — 1 case
Marbet v. Keisling, 838 P.2d 580 (Or. 1992). “131(1) and (2) provide: "(1) Any person alleging that an estimate required under ORS 250.125 was prepared, filed or certified in violation of the procedures specified in ORS 250.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 250.125(4) — 2 cases
Marbet v. Keisling, 838 P.2d 580 (Or. 1992). “131(1) and (2) provide: "(1) Any person alleging that an estimate required under ORS 250.125 was prepared, filed or certified in violation of the procedures specified in ORS 250.”
McCormick v. Brown, 333 P.3d 992 (Or. 2014). “Respondents, members of the financial estimate committee created under ORS 250.125, have responded and concede that the procedures were not followed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.