Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 261.470 (2026)

Accounting system adopted by board; annual reports; annual audit

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      261.470 Accounting system adopted by board; annual reports; annual audit. (1) The board shall adopt the effective uniform system of accounts prescribed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and require that accounting for receipts and disbursements for the district be accomplished in accordance with said system of accounts.

      (2) The board shall file with the Director of the State Department of Energy and with the county clerk of each county included within the boundaries of the district an annual report in the form required by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

      (3) An annual audit shall be made in the manner provided in ORS 297.405 to 297.555. A copy of such audit shall be filed with each county clerk of the county in which the district or any portion of the boundaries of the district is located, and in the office of the Secretary of State and in the office of the Director of the State Department of Energy, where it shall remain a public record. [Amended by 1953 c.354 §2; 1977 c.774 §16; 1979 c.286 §3; 1985 c.474 §4]

 

      261.505 [Amended by 1973 c.796 §17; 1975 c.647 §21; renumbered 261.055]

 

      261.510 [Amended by 1959 c.72 §1; repealed by 1973 c.796 §79]

 

      261.515 [Repealed by 1973 c.796 §79]

 

COURT PROCEEDING TO TEST CERTAIN DISTRICT PROCEEDINGS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1984–1984 · leading case: DeFazio v. Washington Pub. Power Supply Sys., 679 P.2d 1316 (Or. 1984).
DeFazio v. Washington Pub. Power Supply Sys., 679 P.2d 1316 (Or. 1984). · cites it 2× “The board of directors may borrow from banks or other financial institutions, on notes payable within 12 months, such sums as the board of directors deems necessary or advisable; however, the amounts so borrowed, together with the principal amounts of other like borrowings then…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.