Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 315.357 (2026)

Time limit applicable to energy conservation tax credit

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      315.357 Time limit applicable to energy conservation tax credit. (1) For a facility other than a renewable energy resource equipment manufacturing facility, a taxpayer may not be allowed a credit under ORS 315.354 unless the taxpayer:

      (a) Files an application for preliminary certification under ORS 469B.145 on or before April 15, 2011;

      (b) Receives preliminary certification under ORS 469B.157 before July 1, 2011; and

      (c) Receives final certification under ORS 469B.161 before January 1, 2013, or has demonstrated, to the State Department of Energy, evidence of beginning construction before April 15, 2011.

      (2) Any preliminary certification issued for a facility, other than a renewable energy resource equipment manufacturing facility, under ORS 469B.157 that remains outstanding as of July 1, 2011, shall expire on July 1, 2014. [2007 c.843 §24; 2009 c.913 §15; 2010 c.76 §5; 2011 c.474 §24; 2011 c.730 §1; 2012 c.45 §16]

 

      315.360 [Amended by 1953 c.132 §3; repealed by 1965 c.26 §6]

 

      315.365 [Repealed by 1965 c.26 §6]

 

      315.455 [Repealed by 1965 c.26 §6]

 

      315.460 [Repealed by 1965 c.26 §6]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2015–2020 · leading case: Cascade Kelly Holdings, LLC v. Oregon Dep't of Energy, 365 P.3d 603 (Or. Ct. App. 2015).
Cascade Kelly Holdings, LLC v. Oregon Dep't of Energy, 365 P.3d 603 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 6× “Contrary to petitioner’s contention, we do not understand ORS 315.357 or OAR 330-090-0160 to permit issuance of a final certificate after a preliminary certificate has expired or after July 1, 2014.”
SIF Energy, LLC v. State ex rel. Dep't of Energy, 365 P.3d 664 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “In that case, we held that the underlying controversy was moot, in light of the legislature’s 2012 enactment of ORS 315.357(2), a “sunset” provision phasing out the business energy tax credit.”
Dept. of Rev. v. Sedgewick, 24 Or. Tax 178 (Or. T.C. 2020). “If the Oregon income tax liability of the person holding the BETC was insufficient to absorb the amount of credit available for a particular year, the holder could carry 3 See ORS 315.357. 4 This order generally uses the term “project owner” to refer to the prospec- tive or…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 315.357(2) — 2 cases
SIF Energy, LLC v. State ex rel. Dep't of Energy, 365 P.3d 664 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). “In that case, we held that the underlying controversy was moot, in light of the legislature’s 2012 enactment of ORS 315.357(2), a “sunset” provision phasing out the business energy tax credit.”
Cascade Kelly Holdings, LLC v. Oregon Dep't of Energy, 365 P.3d 603 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). “Contrary to petitioner’s contention, we do not understand ORS 315.357 or OAR 330-090-0160 to permit issuance of a final certificate after a preliminary certificate has expired or after July 1, 2014.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.