Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 390.632 (2026)

Public access to coastal shorelands

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      390.632 Public access to coastal shorelands. (1) In order to further the policy established in ORS 390.610 and to preserve the right of public access to the ocean shore, the State Parks and Recreation Department shall coordinate with affected local governments to provide increased public access to the coastal shorelands.

      (2) The State Parks and Recreation Department may:

      (a) Ensure that beach access sites are posted for public use;

      (b) Maintain parking and trash disposal facilities at beach access sites; and

      (c) Maintain beach access sites in a safe and litter-free manner. [1999 c.872 §2]

 

(Regulating Use of Ocean Shore)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: Ortega v. Martin, 497 P.3d 314 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ortega v. Martin, 497 P.3d 314 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “The state argued that, under ORS 390.632(1), the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department “coordinate[s] with affected local governments to provide increased public access to the coastal shorelands,” and under ORS 390.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 390.632(1) — 1 case
Ortega v. Martin, 497 P.3d 314 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “The state argued that, under ORS 390.632(1), the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department “coordinate[s] with affected local governments to provide increased public access to the coastal shorelands,” and under ORS 390.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 390.632(2) — 1 case
Ortega v. Martin, 497 P.3d 314 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “The state argued that, under ORS 390.632(1), the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department “coordinate[s] with affected local governments to provide increased public access to the coastal shorelands,” and under ORS 390.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.