419B.234
Qualifications; duties; privilege.
(1) A person appointed as a guardian ad litem under ORS 419B.231:
(a) Must be a
licensed mental health professional or attorney;
(b) Must be
familiar with legal standards relating to competence;
(c) Must have
skills and experience in representing persons with mental and physical
disabilities or impairments; and
(d) May not be a
member of the parent’s family.
(2) The guardian
ad litem is not a party in the proceeding but is a representative of the
parent.
(3) The guardian
ad litem shall:
(a) Consult with
the parent, if the parent is able, and with the parent’s attorney and make any
other inquiries as are appropriate to assist the guardian ad litem in making
decisions in the juvenile court proceeding.
(b) Make legal
decisions that the parent would ordinarily make concerning the juvenile court
proceeding including, but not limited to, whether to:
(A) Admit or deny
the allegations of any petition;
(B) Agree to or
contest jurisdiction, wardship, temporary commitment, guardianship or permanent
commitment;
(C) Accept or
decline a conditional postponement; or
(D) Agree to or
contest specific services or placement.
(c) Make
decisions concerning the adoption of a child of the parent including release or
surrender, certificates of irrevocability and consent to adoption under ORS
109.301, 109.302 or 418.270 and agreements under ORS 109.268.
(d) Control the
litigation and provide direction to the parent’s attorney on the decisions that
would ordinarily be made by the parent in the proceeding.
(e) Inform the
court if the parent no longer needs a guardian ad litem.
(4) In making
decisions under subsection (3) of this section, the guardian ad litem shall
make the decisions consistent with what the guardian ad litem believes the
parent would decide if the parent did not lack substantial capacity to either
understand the nature and consequences of the proceeding or give direction or
assistance to the parent’s attorney on decisions the parent must make in the
proceeding.
(5) The parent’s
attorney shall follow directions provided by the guardian ad litem on decisions
that are ordinarily made by the parent in the proceeding. The parent’s attorney
shall inquire at every critical stage in the proceeding as to whether the
parent’s competence has changed and, if appropriate, shall request removal of
the guardian ad litem.
(6)(a) A parent
for whom a guardian ad litem has been appointed under ORS 419B.231 has a
privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent any other person from disclosing
confidential communications made for the purpose of facilitating the rendition
of professional services to the parent:
(A) Between the
guardian ad litem and the parent’s attorney or a representative of the
attorney; or
(B) Between the
guardian ad litem and the parent.
(b) The privilege
created by this subsection:
(A) May be
claimed by the parent or the guardian ad litem. The guardian ad litem may claim
the privilege only on behalf of the parent.
(B) Is subject to
ORS 40.280, 40.285 and 40.290. [2005 c.450 §3; 2021 c.398 §69]
419B.236 [1993 c.33 §88; repealed by 2001
c.622 §57]
Notes of Decisions
Dep't of Human Servs. v. K. L. W., 288 P.3d 1030 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 14× “234, after a guardian ad litem is appointed, the guardian ad litem must “[m]ake legal decisions that the parent would ordinarily make concerning” the termination proceeding. ORS 419B.”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. C. M. H., 486 P.3d 772 (Or. 2021).
“803(1) (providing that “[a] juvenile court having subject matter jurisdiction has jurisdiction over” specified parties); ORS 419B.234(3) (providing that a guardian ad litem can “[a]gree to * * * jurisdiction”).”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. M. U. L., 380 P.3d 1232 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).
“As support for her claim that her attorney rendered inadequate representation in connection with the GAL appointment, mother cites ORS 419B.234(5), which provides in part: “The parent’s attorney shall inquire at every critical stage in the proceeding as to whether the parent’s…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. S. L. M., 321 Or. App. 111 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 2× “Mother does not point to any evidence in the record to suggest that her attorney was not paying attention to 2 ORS 419B.234 has been amended since mother’s GAL hearing.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.234(3) — 2 cases
Dept. of Human Servs. v. C. M. H., 486 P.3d 772 (Or. 2021).
“803(1) (providing that “[a] juvenile court having subject matter jurisdiction has jurisdiction over” specified parties); ORS 419B.234(3) (providing that a guardian ad litem can “[a]gree to * * * jurisdiction”).”
Dep't of Human Servs. v. K. L. W., 288 P.3d 1030 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
“234, after a guardian ad litem is appointed, the guardian ad litem must “[m]ake legal decisions that the parent would ordinarily make concerning” the termination proceeding. ORS 419B.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.234(3)(a) — 2 cases
Dep't of Human Servs. v. K. L. W., 288 P.3d 1030 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
“234, after a guardian ad litem is appointed, the guardian ad litem must “[m]ake legal decisions that the parent would ordinarily make concerning” the termination proceeding. ORS 419B.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.234(3)(b) — 2 cases
Dep't of Human Servs. v. K. L. W., 288 P.3d 1030 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
“234, after a guardian ad litem is appointed, the guardian ad litem must “[m]ake legal decisions that the parent would ordinarily make concerning” the termination proceeding. ORS 419B.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.234(4) — 2 cases
Dep't of Human Servs. v. K. L. W., 288 P.3d 1030 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
“234, after a guardian ad litem is appointed, the guardian ad litem must “[m]ake legal decisions that the parent would ordinarily make concerning” the termination proceeding. ORS 419B.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419B.234(5) — 2 cases
Dep't of Human Servs. v. M. U. L., 380 P.3d 1232 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).
“As support for her claim that her attorney rendered inadequate representation in connection with the GAL appointment, mother cites ORS 419B.234(5), which provides in part: “The parent’s attorney shall inquire at every critical stage in the proceeding as to whether the parent’s…”
Dept. of Human Servs. v. S. L. M., 321 Or. App. 111 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
“Mother does not point to any evidence in the record to suggest that her attorney was not paying attention to 2 ORS 419B.234 has been amended since mother’s GAL hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.